2007-01-31 12:47:01 · 13 answers · asked by Kevan D 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well, not a religious question, I would say hit them hard hit them fast and do not stop till it is over. If people hide in religious sectors the military should allow them one hour to turn them over before leveling it to the ground.
I know this sounds harsh but wars should not be fought with one hand behind the back. I believe President Bush could be faulted for slowing down and fighting a holding action when they should have been pushing aggressive. Doing this would have stopped many needless deaths on our side.
But, regardless, like WWII it was a necessary war and the people can be better off when we leave if done proper.
2007-01-31 12:59:26 · answer #1 · answered by crimthann69 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. I think that if Iraq was populated by Christians, it would not have been invaded. It's easier to topple a government and get the new government to share its oil reserves with you if you can confound the issue by talking about that country's religion and how it "treats its women". Saddam had no WMDs, the UN did not authorize the invasion of Iraq, and the President of the United States (no coincidence that he's a Texas oil man) can't make a speech without talking about God and thinks that God told him to invade Iraq. Not hard to connect the dots. Meanwhile, Canada is in Afghanistan fighting the real enemy, the Taliban. Wrong. Very wrong.
2007-01-31 12:55:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Iraq is the first step toward taking back the Holy Land.
2007-01-31 13:26:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pfft. Mine don't. I don't believe in God, and I see the Iraq war as a bungled mess led by a woefully incompetent administration. I'm not sure if it was a mistake or not to go in, but it is certainly a mistake to drag out an unwinnable war.
2007-01-31 12:52:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Killing is killing no matter how you put it. We could still have alot of good men and women contributing to society if we didn't try settling everyone else's problems! The first ammendment
states " Thou shalt not kill" is it really that hard to understand?
As far as the reason our soldiers are still there doing exactly
what the Bible clearly states as wrong is because our great leader thinks that losing a few thousand soldiers is acceptable
as he put it.
2007-01-31 13:05:11 · answer #5 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
My views aren't religious at all I just see it as it is. The Iraqis are too deep in their culture to live the kind of life we believe that they should, so the best thing to do is pull out.
2007-01-31 12:52:54 · answer #6 · answered by Laela (Layla) 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not at all. I knew before we got out of the gate America was in another Vietnam it couldn't win.
2007-01-31 14:04:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I do not feel it is a religious war---it's a war against Islamic terrorists whose religion compels them to kill.
2007-01-31 12:53:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
My religion is peaceful. We do not support any war, but especially not this war.
2007-01-31 13:23:16 · answer #9 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well i'm agnostic and as an agnostic i can look at how bush truly is and that's as an idiot a liar and a pice of trash who is ruining the united states more and more with every move that he makes anyway christians will most likely support bush no matter what as he's a fellow christian
2007-01-31 12:52:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋