2007-01-31 10:41:07 · 9 answers · asked by vitriol for the masses 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
koloatocomics you really should check YOUR facts before accusing anyone of anything. Iran has been cleaning out it's intelectuals since the days of the sjah maybe that is not "ethnic" cleansing but it's cleansing nevertheless and anyway an answer coming from a person that asks questions like this :' If Preparation H paid to use the likeness of Nancy Pelosi in January, do you think sales would go up? " has not much weight anyway!
2007-01-31 11:20:46 · update #1
AND NONE OF YOU GUYS GOT IT !!! THERE WERE NO WEAPOSN OF MASS DESTRUCTION .YOU ARE ALL FIRED!!!!!
2007-01-31 11:22:12 · update #2
Sure, why not. Im in the reserves, been called up for two tours in Iraq. I imagine Iran is a lovely place this time of year.
2007-01-31 10:51:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the basis for invading yet another country should be approached with caution.Im from da UK n I support the iraq war but you dont want a trigger happy reputation.Irans a big country n it only takes a push of a button and your in trouble.
2007-01-31 10:46:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually we should have knocked the snot out of Iran a long time ago but with our military being stretched so thin and tied down in iraq... it would be a major mistake to go to war with iran and of course Iran knows this.
2007-01-31 10:51:49 · answer #3 · answered by huckleberry 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude, Of Course! The American prez will think that the Iranians will use on the U.S. but thay will most likley use on Isael first. But we'll still invade!
2007-01-31 11:48:11 · answer #4 · answered by A question or two... 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No we shouldnt...there is a major difference....the difference is...for all you LIBERALS..out there that they werent involved in ethinic cleansing as Saddam was with the kurds.
they werent in direct defiance of un sanctions as iraq was
they didnt take over another country and attempt to kill ALL its citizens as iraq did with kuwait
and they didnt attempt further blitzkreig as iraq threatened to do
yawn....once again another LIBERAL..in need of a fact checker....yawn.....
2007-01-31 10:45:32 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think with precision weapons, and satellite reconnaissance, we won't need to invade.
2007-01-31 10:55:00 · answer #6 · answered by irishman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should we just gamble & take a chance? Maybe there is life after death - I hope so.
2007-01-31 10:59:22 · answer #7 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no..we can did it from the air..bombings..no need to invade..
2007-01-31 10:46:51 · answer #8 · answered by Kingofreportedabuse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
......I can't find IRAK on any map......
2007-01-31 10:47:40 · answer #9 · answered by infobrokernate 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋