Evolution or Creatioin....OR Both?

Question

Ok, I am a evolutionist and a creationist. Now because the reason I believe in such things is that we as humans within THIS WORLD are too perfect to actually fall inthis form we are now in today. I mean, this does not mean that im not an evolutionist, just imagine a world being left alone and through trillions of years of evolution ALONE we as humans would have at least not only have different skins, hair, or eyes, but also our external appearance of ourselves would have been totally different.
A couple of million years ago our legs, arms, sense of smell the vission or our eyes could have been totally diverse from one another (I.E. A bats vision is almost a redish color because they adapt to the dark while we see all colors). What im trying to get across here is that if a creator did not exist we would all look commonly like freaks. But since there is a perfect law (which science is still in the process of finding out, besides creationist science) to which we still maintain our

perfect body form, sense of smell and vision and how nature is so perfect in most of its creation.

Efrom, what if god created this world through the big bang!! ponder on that.

Answer 1

I believe that God created everything! There was no "big bang" and we didn't evolve from monkeys. That is just stupid! There is a God and He loves all of us! I don't care what other people say God is there!

Answer 2

See most are stubborn but evolution isn't really the question of which but how. For example In the bible they talk of the garden of Eden which is surrounded by barren land but Africa has similar features such as Africa which in some places vast beautiful jungles but then you enter desolate and barren rocky areas and desert just like where Africa currently has a section breaking off in the East Part and where they say the oldest man is.

I am Catholic and my section of Christianity which practically the only right one is realizing this. Also, the Big Bang could have been the process of how god created everything and 6 days to god could be billions to us which you have to bring into concept and we also have the 7th day when god rested which is now our Sabbath day or day of rest (Sunday).

Sorry about accidentally saying the garden of evil and flipped out once I saw that and changed it.

Answer 3

you are only basing your question on the external what about the organs we no longer need to stay alive, but when something goes wrong with them we suffer greatly. Plus we are by no means perfect your eye sight pales in comparison to the other animals each one adapted to their own special needs. take the common cat, what is midnight and almost no light to us is dusk to them, or animal that totally blind and rely the other sense to get around. or what about the other senses that the animal kingdom has come up with, e.i. the ones that sharks and dolphins have (the ability to sense the electrical impulses that the body puts out. or even sonar.) we don't even have that.
evolution is just survival of the most fit, and the most adaptable.

Answer 4

Your combined belief is where the religions are going to have to go. Evolution can't be ignored. It has to be accepted. Pretty soon, the Creationists will say that God created Evolution and we athiests will have a harder time arguing this topic. It's going to take a couple hundred year since Creationists are too stubborn to think politically.

Answer 5

You say if a Creator did not exist we would all look like freaks... but what does a freak look like? Perhaps we are freaks, but because we don't know anything else besides ourselves, we think we are normal.
I don't think you realise just how long TRILLIONS of years is... that's plenty of time for natural selection to create diversity and the seemingly 'perfect' design of nature.
The complexity of nature is no proof that a creator exists. It may mean that something else worked in conjunction with evolution to create our current world, but not necessarily a conscious creator.

Answer 6

Creationists science is not in accord with true science & neither is evolutionary science.

--Doctrines in both cases get in the way of truth which is why there is great confusion in both!
--Rid the falseness in both and we have truth!

--There are laws in true science and truths in science that the Bible speaks of that are indeed acceptable--God has full understanding of sciences that have hardly been approached by even true and honest science, such as:
--time, demension, infinity etc.
-- Reference is made next to not only to
the perfect things we have on earth, lest man, but to proven sciences and their flexible laws:

(James 1:17) 17 Every good gift and every perfect present is from above, for it comes down from the Father of the [celestial] lights, and with him there is not a variation of the turning of the shadow. ""

--The God of the universe made all things with set patterns--thus humans are what they were supposed to be (less perfection) all other things such as air, water, plants, gravity, enertia, electro-magnetic laws etc. testify to fit a perfect mold or pattern.
--Is it not true that these phenomenon play their role despite mans efforts of ruination of their perfection. ?

--Thus would you not think if God did not exist we would not exist:

*** ct p. 48 From “the RNA World” or Another World? ***

Appendix B

From “the RNA World” or Another World?

In view of the DNA-RNA-protein team impasse, some researchers have offered “the RNA world” theory. What is that? Instead of asserting that DNA, RNA, and proteins originated simultaneously to produce life, they say that RNA by itself was the first spark of life. Is this theory sound?

In the 1980’s, researchers discovered in their laboratory that RNA molecules could act as their own enzymes by snipping themselves in two and splicing themselves back together. So it was speculated that RNA might have been the first self-replicating molecule. It is theorized that in time, these RNA molecules learned to form cell membranes and that finally, the RNA organism gave rise to DNA. “The apostles of the RNA world,” writes Phil Cohen in New Scientist, “believe that their theory should be taken, if not as gospel, then as the nearest thing to truth.”

Not all scientists, though, accept this scenario. Skeptics, observes Cohen, “argued that it was too great a leap from showing that two RNA molecules partook in a bit of self mutilation in a test tube, to claiming that RNA was capable of running a cell single-handed and triggering the emergence of life on Earth.”

There are other problems as well. Biologist Carl Woese holds that “the RNA world theory . . . is fatally flawed because it fails to explain where the energy came from to fuel the production of the first RNA molecules.” And researchers have never located a piece of RNA that can replicate itself from scratch. There is also the issue of where RNA came from in the first place. Though “the RNA world” theory appears in many textbooks, most of it, says researcher Gary Olsen, “is speculative optimism.”

This simple text sums things up perfectly:

(Hebrews 3:4-5) 4 Of course, every house is constructed by someone, but he that constructed all things is God. 5. . .

Answer 7

Its possible God used evolution to create man. That would explain why we no longer evolve and the lack of the missing link. U no longer observe Macto evolution today,

Answer 8

I am an evolutionist, I believe in the survive of the fittest. Can't you see we have all evolved different? Can't we are different?

Answer 9

Evolution and Science will only prove the Bible to be accurate.