English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Some do, (Baptists, Pentacostalists) others have a more rational outlook, (Catholics, Anglicans) and some sit on the fence, (Orthodox, Methodists)

2007-01-31 07:39:07 · answer #1 · answered by Red P 4 · 0 0

I am a Christian and I think natural selection is easily observed. Many so-called "Creationists" get caught up in an ideology and then close their eyes to anything they think doesn't fit.

There's no question at all about the fact that animals adapt to their environment and that the stronger survive. In fact, "natural selection" as Darwin describes it is technically a "tautology." That is, "survival of the fittest" is the same as "only the fittest survive" - it's ultimately a circular argument.

The real question (read: problem) with modern Darwinists is that they claim that animals have evolved *across species.* There is clear evidence of adaptation (i.e., microevoltion), but there is no fossil evidence of macroevolution. Scientists cite fossils of lizards that appeared to have feathers, etc. yet, that is simply an extinct species, not evidence of linear macroevolution.

Evolution is full of holes, and scientists are unwilling to admit it. Where is the explanation for plant life? What is the explanation for our complex *inter-dependent* systems? They could not have evolved separately. All-in-all, any honest person can see that species adapt or die.

The real issue (and the one that the Bible contradicts) is the claim that we all living beings share a common single-celled ancestor.

Hope that helps.

2007-01-31 07:40:51 · answer #2 · answered by Jacob M 2 · 0 0

Your assumptions are incorrect. the large bang idea does no longer state that there change into "no longer something there." It states that on the starting up of time, all count number and potential were centred interior of an identical position. This fact has no longer something to do with faith or the shortcoming thereof. it really is a deduction from observable info. Evolution for sure might want to happen from organic determination. organic determination is inevitable for residing issues in an environment the position substances and potential for using existence are restricted. version is the inevitable outcome, so for sure we count number on it. to no longer count number on it, you should imagine a unique universe the position residing issues produce in uncomplicated words adequate offspring to replace themselves interior the subsequent era and this is not a threat to inherit an income. "the position all of it got here from" might want to be the first or first few residing cells. How precisely those cells were shaped is an merchandise of hypothesis and modern-day study. yet declaring God Did It supplies you precisely no sensible concepts. And if God created each little thing, you're claiming that God created the sturdy and the undesirable alike. both you and the most cancers cells that killed your grandpa and the polio that maimed your uncle and the malaria that kills over a million children each year. If it is your God, practice me he exists. I received't like him.

2016-10-17 04:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Natural Selection is an awesome way to ensure that the strongest and best of a species survives, instead of the weak ones taking all the food and room, hurting the species.
The faster deer outrun the wolves, the slower ones are lunch. Making the next generation of deer faster.
They gots the ability, Natural Selection just enhances it.

BUT...

If you got a deer being chased by wolves, there is absolutely no way it could grow wings and fly away. The ones who are fast enough to run away have no need to fly. Deer will never "evolve" wings.

Natural Selection = Obvious proven fact

Evolution = Constantly changing in the face of evidence, un-provable, illogical theory.

if you want to talk about it, my e-mail is
stevedude256@yahoo.com
Don't spam me, but i do want to talk.

2007-01-31 09:26:40 · answer #4 · answered by stevedude256 2 · 1 1

a myth is a symbolic story intended to represent human finite qualities through infinite ideas.

No.

At least, not this one.

I just don't believe natural selection is the cause of evolution.

2007-01-31 07:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by Doug 5 · 0 0

As a Christian I don't believe in natural selection...sorry.

2007-01-31 07:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by Jan P 6 · 0 1

I am a Christian and I believe that NS occurs.

2007-01-31 07:40:18 · answer #7 · answered by nosrettaptnilc 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers