English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

how we can prove taht
v²+v-1≤(4v+v*log10v)3 + 4v+v*log10v
also that
4v+v*log10v ≤ (v²+v-1)3 +(v²+v-1)*log10(v²+v-1

2007-01-31 07:14:58 · 4 answers · asked by rania a 1 in Science & Mathematics Engineering

how we can prove that v²+v-1≤(4v+v*log10v)3 + 4v+v*log10v?

(4v+v*log10v)3 the nomber 3 is cupe

2007-01-31 07:21:36 · update #1

4 answers

you could probably prove that using math

2007-01-31 07:32:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The first thing that comes to mind would be to use mathematical induction. That is:
1) Prove it works for v = 1 (evaluate)
2) Prove that P(k) implies P(k+1); that is, assume it's true for v = k (or any dummy variable), and use that to prove it's true for k+1
Of course, that only proves it for natural number values of v. Not sure how to do otherwise.

2007-01-31 15:45:18 · answer #2 · answered by chiyaniwatori 2 · 0 0

If you can take the left side of the inequality and divide it by the right side and show that it never exceeds 1, you have your proof. You might have to differentiate and find the max.

2007-01-31 16:11:36 · answer #3 · answered by Gene 7 · 0 0

ipro

ve you like this:^2+^-1>(4^+^golo1^)3+4^+^*gol01^????
osla taht ^4+^gol#(^*+^1)*gol01(^*+^-1.

2007-01-31 15:37:42 · answer #4 · answered by aura gcranberrymadurogustosocinc 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers