Fox News was sued by reporters who were to report on a case dealing with growth homones being used on dairy cows and the negative effect of their milk on a person's health .because they did not wish to go along with Fox News wish to say the opposite of what a study had shown that growth hormones DO have negative effects on health. Fox news fired these reporter and then was let off the hook for promoting a false medical report due to their right to "freedom of speech", even though it was a flat out lie.
2007-01-31 05:29:01 · 5 answers · asked by Charles R 1 in Health ➔ Diet & Fitness
No, but who watches that channel anyways??? The only time of year they are worth tunning is on new year's eve, at least for me I like to watch the ball dropping live.
2007-01-31 05:39:04 · answer #1 · answered by Lil' Gay Monster 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I haven't heard of your report, but agree that cow's milk is not at all the wonder food we have been lead to believe.
Humans are the only animal that drinks milk past infancy, and then it's not even from the correct species! Too many people are still trying to defend milk's supposed health benefits. Unfortunately, they are either using old information or information obtained from research funded by the dairy association. How many people would enjoy a glass of dog's milk or rat's milk? What makes cows special?
There are only two reasons which I've found to support humans drinking cow's milk. We have grown up hearing that it's good for us and we've grown accustomed to the taste and texture. There is absolutely no nutrition that can not be obtained elsewhere, minus the negatives. Calcium seems to be the major claim for milk. It can be found elsewhere in green vegetables, almonds, and many other sources. Where do you think the cows obtain the calcium to put into the milk? Where do other larger animals (elephants, horses, deer, whales, etc) get calcium? Why we continue to drink cow's milk laced with growth hormones, antibiotics, and who knows what else is beyond me.
Since I've given up drinking milk about 5 years ago my health has greatly improved. I suffer fewer allergy problems, asthma and breathing problems are greatly reduced, I'm sleeping better, and I have more energy.
In the '50s smoking was considered harmless but now we realize its dangers. One person at a time and eventually the truth will become widely known that cow's milk is only for baby cows. Milk is indeed the perfect food, but only for infants of the proper species.
Do some research online and decide for yourself.
http://www.strongbones.org/
http://www.notmilk.com/
http://www.nomilk.com/
2007-02-02 09:25:29 · answer #2 · answered by Warren914 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is a lot of truth to what you have said. milk is not the "healthy" food item that the dairy industry would like us to believe. human adults don't need milk. 70% of the worlds population does not drink milk after the age that babies are no longer weened and they do not have a higher rate of calcium deficiencies than the populations that do.
human beings especially those in the US consume a lot of foods that the body simply does not need. unfortunately in the US we have a billion dollar dairy industry that is not seen in most countries. just like big tobacco people in this country would be healthier with out both of them
2007-01-31 07:04:51 · answer #3 · answered by lv_consultant 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
a minimum of they got here out and admitted it and immediately fired the guy. while the different "considerable" information merchants lie or scientific expert video/audio, they warfare to cover it up, then the left provides suggested guy or woman an award.
2016-11-01 23:32:38 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First That I have heard of it . I'll check it out.
2007-01-31 05:32:45 · answer #5 · answered by Sugar 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋