Should the DC Police Chief lose his job?

Question

After he ok'd the War Protesters the right to spray paint and disface the US Capital building. It is not his building it is our building. Anywhere else and they would have been arrested.

Answer 1

Yes... And we should hold Congress accountable to look into the matter. If someone painted Mt. Rushmore or started cutting down trees in a National forest and the police just stood by people would send the police force packing.

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

The U.S. Capitol Police Chief, Phillip Morse, answers to Nancy Pelosi. She should be fired.

And to all those who are questioning whether or not this really happened, it did. The New York Times reported that the anti-war protestors actually spit on war veterans marching by, threatened police officers with bottles of human urine, pelted a Fox News truck with rocks and spray-painted street signs and the Capitol building.

Why wasn't it stopped? That's a good question. Any other type of demonstration that defaced government buildings and private property would have been.

And by the way - law says that the protestors should have had to clean up their mess, but who did it? Capitol staff, on their own time.

Answer 4

the television coverage did no longer help the case. education and disciplines selection in accordance to area and way of existence. the reality that they have got been handling an uncommon threat like a knowledgeable police officer might have affected the selections of the human beings in contact. The SWAT team regarded uncoordinated and unprepared in the face of the disaster. that's to no longer say i ought to do greater valuable or that it may no longer ensue someplace else only as badly. however the team introduced their presence, there grew to become into no element of ask your self, secrecy or tactical operation. only a very long, drawn out and not on time storming offence which grew to become into unsuccessful. there grew to become into additionally some question approximately whether the hostage taker grew to become into killed by using sniper fire till now the tactical unit entered the bus and fired bullets in the direction of the bus from the interior. This too made the human beings in contact seem undesirable because evidently they shot a civilian or civilians after the actual disaster had ended. that's a tragic end to a bad concern. i do no longer envy the police chief or his team. that's honourable to renounce in the face of this sort of failure yet might no longer be mandatory.

Answer 5

Well, if it is true then I would say YES!!! On the other hand, I think there is probably more to the story. Oh, and by the way, I'm for the war, so I am not trying to find a defense for the actions.

Answer 6

A crowd has the right to assemble in peace.Did the chief do his job as he swore to do?Could the protesters have incited a riot?

Answer 7

First of all the D.C Metropolitan chief of police is a she, and I doubt that any chief would give permission to deface government property. Before you question somebody job get the right department and person

Answer 8

I believe he should be fired if the facts are what you say.

Vandalism is NOT free speech, and it's not art. Anyone who thinks it is can post their name and address so that all of those graffiti "artists" can go to their home and mark all of their belongings.

Come on people...put your money where your mouth is. Let them come to your home and spray paint your home, your car, your clothing, your floors and walls. It's just their free speech, right?

.

Answer 9

Three options. 1. Lose his job 2. Let him pay to clean it up. 3. Let him clean it up himself.

Answer 10

no real harm no foul; they probably ok'd the defacement themselves so they could approve a new paint job