Silly little short sighted idea isn't it?
Love and blessings Don
2007-01-31 02:24:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think by "masses" he means "lots and lots". The balance between them is constantly changing. Them, and shifting energy levels, pretty much sums up the universe.
2007-01-31 10:25:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bad Liberal 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Umm... is this supposed to be a parody of secular thought?
That jumbled description doesn't sound like anything in science I know about.
Let me ask you, if blind, unconscious physical laws can generate snowflakes of dazzling beauty and near infinite variety, is it really something to be looked down on? Why do you need a human like mind at the helm?
2007-01-31 10:24:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The sum of everything is ratio. The distance between subatomic particles.
2007-01-31 10:28:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by NONAME 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wrong category.
And mass does not change. State of matter may, but overall mass does not.
2007-01-31 10:24:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jay 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most of them do not change.
2007-01-31 10:23:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
relax and peace
2007-01-31 10:42:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by wb 6
·
0⤊
0⤋