This is the results of a yahoo search on Creation Science,
http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=creation+science&fr=yfp-t-501&toggle=1&cop=mss&ei=UTF-8
In reviewing this, it seems like these websites are attacking science fiction, or science from a 1950s textbook,
and aren't really attacking modern science at all.
If they had legitimate scientific criticisms, I would think this is a great mechanism for science and for humankind achievement.
It seems to just be . . . religious.
What are your thoughts?
2007-01-31 01:57:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It has plenty of rhetoric and misinformation but valid challenges founded on viable scientific evidence no. Just look above-one of them is even relying on a convicted criminal called Hovind.
2007-01-31 02:06:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
In reading a lot of Atheist and Agnostic posts here, they seem to be reading that same text book.
YOU and I both grew up KNOWING for a fact there are 9 planets and PLUTO is one of them. That ain't true no more!
A lot of people live under a rock, including, you, I might add. You won't watch or let your kids watch the Christain Cartoons anymore.
Well, a lot of religious people don't watch the news, don't watch PBS, Discovery, some don't allow TV at all. Some Born Again children don't know a TV exists at all until they go somewhere and see one.
Do you think Archie Bunker would know Pluto was or was not a planet at all!
So, that is one of the purposes here to spread the word and the truth!
I once posted an aswer about how Christians in the 1600s segregated blacks into the balcony, something everyone knows is a truth and it's even found in reference books like Britanica and American History books, not to mention Black History books, and it's get me a violation notice and a deleted answer.
Yahoo helping to re-write or white wash history.
Some people just have a hard time with the truth, be that Atheists, Agnostics or Theists.
Atheists are less likely to quote the Big Bang theory once they learn it came from a CAtholic Priest and the Vatacan embraces it.
See it's not about ABSOLUTE truth, it's about PERSASIVE proof to your point of view.
This is something I totally fight against with both Christians and ATheists.
Some Atheist, the other day, cited some "proof" some some scientific paper and the SUB-TITLE or what is called the "coverage" of the article clearly states that is "suggests" now "suggests" is a long way from PROOF.
Sorry, but my dictiontary says PROOF is concuslive, not suggestive.
Atheists do the SAME thing Theists do. And that's a SAD fact for it makes BOTH of them look incredibly UNCREDIBLE.
They use words to twist your mind to their persepective.
That makes them BOTH wrong!
That means BOTH of them are on a BRAINWASHING mission of EVANGELICAL PROPORTIONS trying to build a cult following without a basis in reality.
Oh, do you let your kids watch Yugio or the Fanstatic Four or Superman! How about Cinderalla.
Will they get to watch how Science gave us a tool to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki and has pushed us to the point of North Korea, Iran, Paskistan and India.
2007-01-31 10:35:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Creationists have no valid arguments against anything. They only invented creationism when they realized they were losing ground to evolution. The only thing they can tell you when they are asked to validate there theory is "you just gotta believe". Evolution has more evidence than any other religion can offer.
2007-01-31 10:14:16 · answer #3 · answered by txpilot 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well the first link wouldnt let me back up out of the website.
Have christian sites got to use malicious software to keep people there? How revealing...
My thoughts? If there were a single piece of evidence disputing evolutionary theory we'd bin it and get a better one. There isn't.
2007-01-31 10:13:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The so-called science is based on Dr. Dino, a convict who is serving 10 years in prison
2007-01-31 10:09:24 · answer #5 · answered by FAUUFDDaa 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a creationist, but all of the sources I have read on creationism are happy to accept the Big Bang. They take it as confirmation that the universe had a beginning.
2007-01-31 10:05:29 · answer #6 · answered by NONAME 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The probability of a " chemical accident" resulting in universal order is REMOTE at best-INTELLIGENT DESIGN is SCIENTIFICALLY SOUND.Note:As of 2007 CE. evolution continues to be an un-proven theory.
2007-01-31 10:15:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
creationism is the opposite of science. it starts with a pre-supposed conclusion (that everything was created by a god) and cherry picks through all the evidence to find things that support it, then tries to discredit any evidence against it.
2007-01-31 10:10:04 · answer #8 · answered by Kutekymmee 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You said it all; its religion. They have no real facts to back up their so called science, its a mixture speculative theory and pure bullshit in order to advance a particular philosophical ideal.
2007-01-31 10:16:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My thought is how the BB theory contradicts creation? no one knows where the primeval atom came from.
2007-01-31 10:10:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋