English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have a question. I know that Parvo swept over Ohio this last fall and this winter. I want to know if there are veterinary rules for a veterinarian to inform the dog owner if the dog has a serious illness?

I ask this question because this winter my family went on vacation and we had our dogs stay at a reputable kennel in the area after which the dogs became ill. The Veterinarian brushed off the illness until it became too bad to ignore (two visits later and Vomiting, lethargy, lack of eating, and diarrhea). Both dogs died after they were admitted into emergency care and the vet witheld information on what really happened. They sent the bodies of our dogs to the center of disease control and then gave us a false number at which to call for follow-up. The dogs died from symptoms similar to parvo.

Are there malpractice laws involving canines? How can owners protect themselves?

2007-01-31 01:42:20 · 3 answers · asked by Glasswalker Alpha 1 in Pets Dogs

We did research the vet and kennel... and it seemed fine. I know for future reference I will never go to them again...

2007-01-31 02:07:09 · update #1

3 answers

Sorry this happened. Research the vets you choose for your dogs. Ask for referrals. There isn't much you can do other than report the vet to the AVMA if there was blatant disregard for the safety of your pet.

2007-01-31 02:01:30 · answer #1 · answered by W. 7 · 0 0

report this kennel to the humane society and also to animal control in your area anytime a dog dies after being in a kennel it should be reported because of possible outbreaks and all the state should be notified . also I am sure that animal control and the humane society will be checking after you report this . cause other peoples dogs may have had the same thing happen to them . You should report this incident . sorry for your loss.

2007-01-31 02:40:08 · answer #2 · answered by Kate T. 7 · 0 0

have confidence and have self belief, lady - the regulation ain't on the criminal's area. they only won't be on the sufferer's area very plenty the two. the only area that the regulation is easily on, is the fringe of the regulation. They see themselves as being in a seperate classification of people than something persons. people do no longer attempt to make criminals into sufferers by using fact of psychological ailment, yet you'll be able to desire to actual use your recommendations and picture approximately all the climate which could make a individual doubtlessly be a definite way. that is in basic terms honest. people might desire to be held to blame for their movements, besides the undeniable fact that it is not as much as a various human to choose for to hold them to blame. No human is any further effectual than yet another, so how can somebody punish somebody else without being incorrect themself? in basic terms God can try this. The humanity and human rights of the criminal isn't above the sufferer's interior the eyes of the regulation, yet interior the eyes of God, confident, you're the two the comparable by using fact that is in basic terms honest. each tale has 2 sides. this isn't any extra advantageous to rehabilitate or punish people. that is extra advantageous to attempt to help people to attempt to alter people. 2 wrongs do no longer make a spectacular, so hurting somebody that has harm somebody else can not make experience on earth. There should not be a punishment from yet another human - in basic terms a retaliation. Punishment means that one has potential over the different, yet all people are created equivalent. understand? i'm hoping regardless of you went by using gets extra advantageous.

2016-12-16 17:36:57 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers