English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok, since so many people want to argue about the watch thing.... hmmmmm. Evolutionsists claim that life came from a large explosions of NON-LIVING particles. First, where did those particles come from in the first place???? Second, if something living can come from something non-living, then wouldn't make sense for something non-living to come out of the same? Last time I saw an explosion of some kind, I don't remember any living thing coming out of it..... explosions, contrary to popular belief are DESTRUCTIVE, not CONSRUCTIVE. There is NO hands on proof that evolution exists, or that the universe was 'created' in a 'big bang'. That said, there is also no way to prove that God exists, outside of common sense. But there is also NO WAY to EVER prove that He (the Bible refers to HIM as HE!... NOT she) doesn't exist and that evolution does. True science comes from observable proof, which evolutionists have NONE. That's why it's called a THEORY! So quick pushing it as FACT!

2007-01-31 01:04:56 · 3 answers · asked by Lindz 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

3 answers

You have so much to learn. There is PLENTY of fossil evidence supporting Evolution, you just refuse to accept it.

Theories in Science are not like theories in your world. A theory is something that has been tested and validated over and over by independent scientists. Evolution is a solid theory, and can probably be called a fact. Don't expect it to become a law, because it don't work that way (like the Law of Physics).

The Big Bang sent matter flying in every direction which then over BILLIONS of years formed together oh so slowly to create planets and stars. Our Earth formed and by random chance, life began to form from non-living proteins and amino acids.

Just because YOU don't understand certain scientific theories, does not make them false.

2007-01-31 01:30:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 1

First, evolution does not deal with the origins of life, but only with ongoing change in already existing organisms.

No, a watch cannot create itself. But then again, a watch cannot reproduce itself or change itself or repair itself either. Living organisms can do all of these things. Therefore there is no basis for such an attempted "analogy".

2007-01-31 01:34:00 · answer #2 · answered by PaulCyp 7 · 3 2

Please tell me you are joking.

Nobody is saying that abiogenesis was caused directly by the big bang. I suggest you read up on abiolgenesis, big bang theory and evolution. They are all completely different theories and confusing the three of them makes you look...well, ignorant.

2007-01-31 01:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by mullah robertson 4 · 7 1

fedest.com, questions and answers