English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Uncomplementary name-calling and vicious pointing out of each other's faults and misdeeds is how the Cold War with the Soviets was mostly fought. And the West won this war because the truth US and its allies could say about the Soviets was more vicious and more compelling than what the Soviets could say about the West.

It seems that Osama Bin Laden and his followers still remember the lessons they've learned during the Cold War, while the US and its allies have forgotten and lost their competence in this kind of verbal fighting.

With Al-Qaeda indiscriminately killing civilians, why doesn't the US government say the truth in a vicious way, they way they used to do it with the Soviets?

Why don't they call terrorists animals, savages, murderers of children, bandits and all kinds of other emotional names? This is the truth said in an emotional way, which is how it should be in Psychological Warfare.

2007-01-31 00:34:14 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

15 answers

Because there is a limit to what we are willing to do, and a limit to what our open system would allow us to do without analysing it on the front page of the NYT.

2007-01-31 02:25:57 · answer #1 · answered by Justin 2 · 0 0

Y'all are forgetting one major fact! Our opinions are based on what the NEWS MEDIA presents to us. Sensationalism is the key function of the nightly news.

I learned that many years back. In school and in the news during the cold war, I had the impression that all of the people in Russia wore dark grey clothes and lived in poverty, used Mules to farm , and lived in primitive farm houses.

It wasn't until the cold war was over and photos of the real Russia came out that I saw big city's and cars and trucks moving about. Blew my mind!

Look beyond the videos and you will get a whole different perspective.

Never believe what you hear, and only half of what you see!

2007-01-31 01:23:19 · answer #2 · answered by billy brite 6 · 0 0

Remember, there is a much bigger picture that the general public does not see. There are discussions and decisions made that are classified. We don't see everything the government and military does. Nor should we. It is unlikely that Al-Qaeda's intelligence outweighs the U.S. military's. Al-Qaeda's warfare is based on terrorism not a psychological warfare like we use. We are not terrorists, they are.

2007-01-31 01:18:17 · answer #3 · answered by Goober W 4 · 0 0

Just because the CIA doesn't advertise it's exploits on Al Jaziera as does Al-Qaeda doesn't mean it isn't effective.

In fact, I'd suggest that the point of the CIA is that what it accomplishes are things you and I never know about.

2007-01-31 00:59:57 · answer #4 · answered by Blitzhund 4 · 0 0

Al-Qaeda way of war is to dead fighting or self bombardment
Psychologically they know they will lose
US army are trained to fight a war not to guard the street
that the job for the blue helmets

2007-01-31 01:11:08 · answer #5 · answered by kimht 6 · 0 0

Actually they recieved thir trng from the Russians...they will be defeated. Americans need to wake up as to how to fight back and stay the course in lessons on faith and remain faithful to Biblical ethics. Fight to win...They are Secular humanists, that employ the use of drugs, hypnosis and and not to believe in God. Don't go along to get along.

2007-01-31 02:17:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they have self belief. We the U. S. used to have self belief like while england tried to invade us with their stepped forward technologies of conflict at that factor. It develop into suggested at that factor the English used to declare, in case you killed Paul revere and his kinsman 1000 greater of each might upward push. Does this sound huge-unfold? is that this no longer what they now say approximately sadam, and osoma bin ladin. We the collonies have been being oppressed via a great u . s . a . tring to impose there techniques on our worldwide (the colonies). Does this no longer sound huge-unfold? the information is often quoting the mid east as rejecting western effect . They call us the large devil, and say we've killed tens of millions of their women human beings, and infants with the aid of effect, conflict, and sanctions, depriving them of drugs and milk. To them that is oppression. Is that oppression? Our troops are paid to be over there. they're going to die for unfastened .....who do you think of will win that scenerio....they gained't stop... Then their is , who's greater on the area of fact. nicely the two areas are doing destructive issues, yet i assume the question is who oppressed who? They pray that strengthens their innovations with the aid of prayer....will we pray???? will we enhance our minds???? or are we so rattling busy with contraptions and automobiles and new imaginitive techniques of determining to purchase all that **** that we abondon our households to the comparable forces they hate. our infants don't be conscious human beings and we don't be attentive to our infants... Why because of the fact we've traded them for the flaws that rely no longer and are rusting away and rotting in our closets, and breaking the comparable day we get them...... they are going to die for his or her infants appropriate way or the incorrect way........................................ undesirable we lost that loving feeling................;

2016-11-01 23:06:44 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The U.S. strategy to deal with Alqaeda is flawed from top to bottom. We don't call them what they are and mount aggressive public relations against them because we don't want to piss off the Arab community, who by the way, are supposingly our friends and hate Alqaeda.
It takes guts to fight this war and the guy we got fighting it has none not to mention he has torn allegiance between America and Saudi Arabia.

2007-01-31 01:04:30 · answer #8 · answered by huckleberry 3 · 1 1

The liberals would be screaming at the thought of that. They don't want to offend anyone, even if their heads are being sawed off.

2007-01-31 01:07:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Because they talk little of something which contains excitement

2007-01-31 00:50:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers