if evolution is real and supposedly took millions of years then its safe to assume all creatures didnt do it at the exact same time, so were are the in betweens?
2007-01-30 20:21:52 · 16 answers · asked by whytepower_ranger 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Ok then faerieWhings: if there is no missing link in the evolution theory that means the link has been found, were is it?
2007-01-30 20:38:03 · update #1
John S: If the Flood that involved Noah and the ark is what caused the link to go missing, then the the bible is true because it tells the story of noah so therefor evolution is false.
2007-01-31 03:23:00 · update #2
gelfling:Your stupidity speaks for it self.
2007-01-31 03:34:12 · update #3
It is NOT safe to assume that! On Yahoo! Answers some half-evolved human
will find some insane reason to be angry with you. Some are afraid there
might even be a {pssst -- God} and they would have to have decent values
instead of primevial base desires or they'd begin to feel guilt or shame.
It is easier for them to simply use others, degrade others, and blame others.
SO BE CAREFUL -- those half-evolvers are everywhere and they hate!
HATE, HATE, HATE but they have highly evolved intellects [just ask them].
they are really good...good at explaining things....explaining plain things...
explaining plain things away....
2007-01-30 20:45:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You're forgetting about the great flood and Noah's Ark! that pretty much took care of any missing links.
2007-01-31 04:44:02 · answer #2 · answered by JUAN FRAN$$$ 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because, they never existed,no missing Link,no half evolved people the fossil evidence shows that every living thing reproduces within it's own kind as the Bible says
2007-01-31 05:14:03 · answer #3 · answered by I speak Truth 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There are, us, we are still evolving. This does not mean we are getting 'better and better' either. Humans are by no means in any perfect form. Most creatures on planet earth are always evolving.
Ostrich, chicken, road runner are probably what you are looking for, a little more obvious
THERE IS NO MISSING LINKS. Thats just what creationist say inorder to discredit evolution.
No Need to find the ACTUAL Ancestor, geez you dont ask for much.
Where is the fossil of the chicken you ate last week for lunch?
2007-01-31 04:26:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
Evolution isn't a conclusion, it's a PROCESS. Ignorant questions like this show how important it is for the facts to be taught in public schools.
2007-01-31 05:05:57 · answer #5 · answered by gelfling 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Actually, Christianity and faith-based religions are proof of the evolution theory - it's the Chimpanzee part of the brain working!
2007-01-31 04:27:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Yeah!...Good question! You would think there'd be a couple goofy half-humans running around! (no, I'm gonna leave the joke alone this time)
Darwin thought he was smart sh** when he said, "Oh survival of the fittest...survival of the fittest!" ...WHATEVER, there would still be at least one freaky cousin left. So where is he?
Plus, God put those bones in the ground to test our faith! What he can make everything, but not put a few bones on a planet?!
2007-01-31 04:46:36 · answer #7 · answered by theWord 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
you're looking for the Missing Link which I am sure has been explained to you DOESN'T EXIST. Only religious folk, trying to discredit evolution (only discrediting themselves) look for it.
***************
'Doesn't exist' must be a mystery for you. 'Doesn't exist' means just that. It doesn't exist. It can't be found. Because it doesn't exist. Why is that simple, everyday phrase an enigma for you?
2007-01-31 04:33:53 · answer #8 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
you can consider yourself as the in between
our brain is big but we are unable to used it to the maximum yet
with headphones everyone using soon we will evolved telepathic
2007-01-31 04:46:24 · answer #9 · answered by kimht 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who says there are not?
I can think of a few candidates.
2007-01-31 09:50:08 · answer #10 · answered by Praise Singer 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋