English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Wildlife Department gets huge budget to save these animals. Shouldn't they be more responsible to avoid the man animal conflict. Infact people are encroaching upon the land and putiing themselves at risk. Shouldn't the Govt. work towards making Wildlife police and help these animals? We have got so many animals in the list of being extinct but we actually need to work out a plan and help all these animals. Don't you think that man is the biggest threat to earth ? Why aren't we actually doing anything to help save these animals. The Prime Miister should help these animals out and get NGO's involved to help save them. Though the animals cannot vote but still it our responsibility to help them. All this violence is a threat to mankind. See by destroying our jungles in the name of development we have actually done more harm to the environment. The changes in climate, pollution and the most important thing Water. Live and Help Live

2007-01-30 17:15:27 · 12 answers · asked by gautam g 1 in Environment

12 answers

justified.............? this is a big question !can u imagine people kill poor and helpless humans during the riot in India and other parts of the world, without any reason. The case of leopard and bear was a little thing against that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So my intention is to save the helpless human first, instead of only two helpless animals.

2007-01-30 17:30:50 · answer #1 · answered by atre_lucy 2 · 0 0

It has become a fashion to couple meaningless politics with violence, abuses, cruelty, inhumanity, etc. Even the animal welfares donot do much to rescue w.r.t. my personal experience of abuse done to my docile and perfect dobermann pets. Whether it is harrassment of a human or an animal, there doesnot appear to be any effective measures to curb the growing menace. We continue to view and hear about such abuses and there is no end to criminal tendencies. The laws and reforms enacted by policy-makers donot really reach out to the masses because of corrupt and biased mediators. The systems adopted to control violence is inadequate and a mere eyewash.

2007-01-30 18:06:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Member since: 30 January 2007

Total points: 107 (Level 1)

Points earned this week: 107
0%Best answer
3 answers

In my view life killing of any animal or human is not justified.
Even in every plant, flower there is life. In Sikhism's Holy Book it is written that a female gardener is plucking those leaves and flowers which have life in them to devote in front of stone made statue of religious image which has no life in it.
Then how can we justify of killing of any living creature

2007-01-30 18:24:57 · answer #3 · answered by yaar_15 1 · 0 0

No,No,Hell no.......... is stupid and horrible Why do we tread them like there Wild Animals i think we are worst then them.By throwing stone burning them and pressing them self like there have done a great thing by killing Bears and Leopard with hundred of peoples around how can we called that a justified is a bad to say we are Human.

2007-01-30 17:24:12 · answer #4 · answered by james l 2 · 0 0

Unfortunately, the enthusiasm that any government gives to any of these issues is based upon economics. Until governments decide to act in the better interest of the global community and the environment, it is unlikely to change. Governments, unfortunately, are the puppets of big business and not the people - in spite of the BS they want you to believe!!!

2007-01-30 17:27:29 · answer #5 · answered by Scarp 3 · 0 0

In my view life killing of any animal or human is not justified.
Even in every plant, flower there is life. In Sikhism's Holy Book it is written that a female gardener is plucking those leaves and flowers which have life in them to devote in front of stone made statue of religious image which has no life in it.
Then how can we justify of killing of any living creature ?

2007-01-30 17:26:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Most countries have wildlife management program.

Now like any thing, the actions may be wrong but I think the intention in this field are always very noble.

2007-01-30 17:22:19 · answer #7 · answered by minootoo 7 · 0 0

God made this variety of bloodthirsty, totalitarian settlement with Israel while you evaluate that became into what the individuals needed. They needed a appropriate regulation, an absolute regulation, and a huge not undemanding God to enforce it, bigger and extra durable than the gods the encircling countries had.

2016-12-13 05:05:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

every wild animal needs protection. Every practice that reduces the number of wild species should be prohibited by enforcing the"wild life Act" laws.

2007-01-30 17:25:02 · answer #9 · answered by Janu 4 · 0 0

People ask dating questions here and don't tell their age. You ask an environmental question and don't tell where in the world you are. Here, we have plenty of bears and leopards don't exist. Instead of ranting, focus.

2007-01-30 17:25:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers