English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

half silly question =)

2007-01-30 16:51:57 · 15 answers · asked by ~blessss♫☼ ♪♥ ☼ ♠♫ ♣☺☻ 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

yes our bodies have negative things in them now, ever since sin came into the picture, as the consequence of sin is death (unless forgiveness payment is received)

2007-01-30 17:17:55 · update #1

15 answers

i dont think that evolutionist believe that God created man in His Image...though the problem i come up with in the evolution theory is that there had to have been something there in order for that something to evolve...something cannot evolve from nothing...personally, i think that when we begin to take God out of the picture...all becomes chaos and nothing makes any sense anymore...

2007-01-30 16:58:40 · answer #1 · answered by Michelle 4 · 1 0

silly indeed.

I do think were on our way to loosing our little toes tho as they have be becoming smaller over the centuries. But for the most part I think we're looking very similar to Jehovah right now.

What I'm really interested in is what angels look like because somewhere in the Bible it says they were seen with 6 wings, not 2, and they too are amde in Gods image yes?

2007-01-31 00:59:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

This issue is ridiculous. First he's GOD and can make anything look like anything He wants it to look like. Hence the term "His own image" Of course being God one would think he has no true form to speak of since God can appear as anything or anyone. Again it goes back to "In his own image" meaning whatever he wants an item or life-form to be it will be according to God's image of it that includes the evolutionary. Period.

2007-01-31 01:11:52 · answer #3 · answered by ugotthat 6 · 0 0

Yes, a happy little clownfish like Nemo. ;)

Of course, if you look at many creationists' bumpers, they have a little ghoti ichthys sticker there, so maybe there isn't that big a difference between the two factions after all...

The tiktaalik has been compared to the Darwin fish. A fossil link between fish and land animals discovered, it is said tongue-in-cheek to be evidence supporting the Darwin fish hypothesis.

2007-01-31 02:07:52 · answer #4 · answered by World Traveler 3 · 0 0

You'd have to assume that Jehovah created man in his image.
I'm kind of hoping that he didn't. I believe that human beings have the potential to be better than this tantruming child-god, but that they won't until they let him go.

However, if you do assume that Adam and Eve were made in the image of "God", does that mean that "God" carries within himself the potential for corruption? If so, was that potential realized in his reported interactions with humanity?

All the best,

Lazarus

2007-01-31 01:15:41 · answer #5 · answered by The Man Comes Around 5 · 0 0

It is true that God created man in his own image but u see that our body is made of dirty stuffs like urine stool and many chemicals but God body is full of bliss and effulgence. evolutionist always work on scientific basis and their theory always keep on changing.

2007-01-31 00:59:58 · answer #6 · answered by amritanshu_20 2 · 1 0

Evolutionists are not generally Christians and they are blinded spiritually. May God Bless U.

2007-01-31 00:57:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Yes, silly.

2007-01-31 00:57:42 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 2 0

Or maybe just a cell of whatever

2007-01-31 00:56:22 · answer #9 · answered by Gifted 7 · 0 0

8/9ths silly

2007-01-31 00:54:39 · answer #10 · answered by Laptop Jesus 2.0 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers