English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

my teacher has documents that we have to open, type in, and then print.....some are boxes that we have to check but the boxes are set so it wont let me type in them. place for name has underline but when i type the line gets all messed up. ahhh someone help I can email the document if it helps

2007-01-30 15:51:13 · 4 answers · asked by Sarah 4 in Computers & Internet Software

4 answers

just try to do this n see if it works (but before make a copy of the document n save it)

if ur Drawing Toolbar is not open then go to View - Toolbars and click on Drawing.
click the mouse icon on the Drawing Toolbar.
select all the boxes and lines using the mouse pointer and go to Edit - Cut
go to View - Header and Footer
go to Edit - Paste
from the Head and Footer Toolbar, press Close

now the boxes and lines are in the background so whatever u write on the front will not mess them up.
to write inside the boxes u can use the Text Box tool.

hope it helps.

2007-01-30 16:11:57 · answer #1 · answered by Sanama 2 · 1 0

If they are "check boxes" you probably just click in them. As for messing up a line when you type, it may not print the way you see it displayed. To explain, click the "print preview" button on the Standard Toolbar to see what it will look like when printed.

Didn't your teacher give you any instructions in class? How about handouts? A book? For some information you might open a Word document and click the Help button. Look for forms.

Don't be afraid to ask your teacher for a little more help - just mix it up with a little humility and respect and I'm sure she will be glad to help you.

2007-01-30 16:13:35 · answer #2 · answered by TheHumbleOne 7 · 1 0

I had to deal once with documents like these, that I can describe as "preformatted". So, Sarah, for what concerns the boxes try select and press the x letter (or the spacebar) to check them. When you have to insert names, select the underline before to start typing.
I hope this can help you. Let me know.

2007-01-30 16:16:28 · answer #3 · answered by geek546 7 · 1 0

Don't you just hate receiving Word documents in email messages? Word attachments are annoying, but worse than that, they impede people from switching to free software. Maybe we can stop this practice with a simple collective effort. All we have to do is ask each person who sends us a Word file to reconsider that way of doing things.

Most computer users use Microsoft Word. That is unfortunate for them, since Word is proprietary software, denying its users the freedom to study, change, copy, and redistribute it. And because Microsoft changes the Word file format with each release, its users are locked into a system that compels them to buy each upgrade whether they want a change or not. They may even find, several years from now, that the Word documents they are writing this year can no longer be read with the version of Word they use then.

But it hurts us, too, when they assume we use Word and send us (or demand that we send them) documents in Word format. Some people publish or post documents in Word format. Some organizations will only accept files in Word format: someone I know was unable to apply for a job because resumes had to be Word files. Even governments sometimes impose Word format on the public, which is truly outrageous.

For us users of free operating systems, receiving Word documents is an inconvenience. But the worst impact of sending Word format is on people who might switch to free systems: they hesitate because they feel they must have Word available to read the Word files they receive. The practice of using the secret Word format for interchange impedes the growth of our community and the spread of freedom. While we notice the occasional annoyance of receiving a Word document, this steady and persistent harm to our community usually doesn't come to our attention. But it is happening all the time.

Many GNU users who receive Word documents try to find ways to handle them. You can manage to find the somewhat obfuscated ASCII text in the file by skimming through it. Free software today can read some Word documents, but not all--the format is secret and has not been entirely decoded. Even worse, Microsoft can change it at any time.

In the future, they might use Palladium or some other "treacherous computing" facility in a new version of Word format, to make it utterly hopeless for any software to access the files without Microsoft authorization. There are also reports that Microsoft is planning to use patented extensions to XML as the basis for a future Word format; anyone who implements free software to read those files could be sued for patent infringement by Microsoft.

If you think of the document you received as an isolated event, it is natural to try to cope with it on your own. But when you recognize it as an instance of a pernicious systematic practice, it calls for a different approach. Managing to read the file is treating a symptom of a chronic illness. To cure the illness, we must convince people not to send or post Word documents.

For about a year, I've made a practice of responding to Word attachments with a polite message explaining why the practice of sending Word files is a bad thing, and asking the person to resend the material in a nonsecret format. This is a lot less work than trying to read the somewhat obfuscated ASCII text in the Word file. And I find that people usually understand the issue, and many say they will not send Word files to others any more.

If we all do this, we will have a much larger effect. People who disregard one polite request may change their practice when they receive multiple polite requests from various people. We may be able to give "don't send Word format" the status of netiquette, if we start systematically raising the issue with everyone who sends us Word files.

To make this effort efficient, you will probably want to develop a canned reply that you can quickly send each time it is necessary. I've included two examples: the version I have been using recently, followed by a new version that teaches a Word user how to convert to other useful formats. They are followed by several suggestions sent by other people.

You can use these replies verbatim if you like, or you can personalize them or write your own. By all means construct a reply that fits your ideas and your personality--if the replies are personal and not all alike, that will make the campaign more effective.

These replies are meant for individuals who send Word files. When you encounter an organization that imposes use of Word format, that calls for a different sort of reply; there you can raise issues of fairness that would not apply to an individual's actions.

Some recruiters ask for resumes in Word format. Amazingly, some recruiters do this even when looking for someone for a free software job. (Anyone using those recruiters for free software jobs is not likely to get someone competent.) To help change this practice, you can put a link to this page into your resume, next to links to other formats of the resume. Anyone hunting for a Word version of the resume will probably read this page.

With our numbers, simply by asking, we can make a difference.

You sent the attachment in Microsoft Word format, a secret proprietary format, so I cannot read it. If you send me the plain text, HTML, or PDF, then I could read it.

Sending people documents in Word format has bad effects, because that practice puts pressure on them to use Microsoft software. In effect, you become a buttress of the Microsoft monopoly. This specific problem is a major obstacle to the broader adoption of GNU/Linux. Would you please reconsider the use of Word format for communication with other people?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You sent the attachment in Microsoft Word format, a secret proprietary format, so it is hard for me to read. If you send me plain text, HTML, or PDF, then I will read it.

Distributing documents in Word format is bad for you and for others. You can't be sure what they will look like if someone views them with a different version of Word; they may not work at all.

Receiving Word attachments is bad for you because they can carry viruses (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macro_virus). Sending Word attachments is bad for you, because a Word document normally includes hidden information about the author, enabling those in the know to pry into the author's activities (maybe yours). Text that you think you deleted may still be embarrassingly present. See http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3154479.stm for more info.

But above all, sending people Word documents puts pressure on them to use Microsoft software and helps to deny them any other choice. In effect, you become a buttress of the Microsoft monopoly. This pressure is a major obstacle to the broader adoption of free software. Would you please reconsider the use of Word format for communication with other people?

To convert the file to HTML using Word is simple. Open the document, click on File, then Save As, and in the Save As Type strip box at the bottom of the box, choose HTML Document or Web Page. Then choose Save. You can then attach the new HTML document instead of your Word document. Note that Word changes in inconsistent ways--if you see slightly different menu item names, please try them.

To convert to plain text is almost the same--instead of HTML Document, choose Text Only or Text Document as the Save As Type.

Your computer may also have a program to convert to pdf format. Select File => Print. Scroll through available printers and select the pdf converter. Click on the Print button and enter a name for the pdf file when requested.

Here's another approach, suggested by Bob Chassell. It requires that you edit it for the specific example, and it presumes you have a way to extract the contents and see how long they are.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am puzzled. Why did you choose to send me 876,377 bytes in your recent message when the content is only 27,133 bytes?

You sent me five files in the non-standard, bloated .doc format that is Microsoft's secret, rather than in the international, public, and more efficient format of plain text.

Microsoft can (and did recently in Kenya and Brazil) have local police enforce laws that prohibit students from studying the code, prohibit entrepeneurs starting new companies, and prohibit professionals offering their services. Please don't give them your support.

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

2007-01-30 18:38:29 · answer #4 · answered by prince 3 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers