ATHEISTS! READ AGAIN! Follow up!!?

Question

Hahah

Okay now, "Gravity" or anything HAVE NOT been proven by science for SURE. WHY? because no matter what they come up with they can never tie everything together to work together. So NONE of the indivual formulas WORK together. They may work indivually but NOT as team. Therefore there IS a GOD!

Even Einstein came to believe that there is SUPERIOR POWER after his many experiments and scientific theories!!

Read my other question if you have no idea what I am talking about!

Also, I am talking in a religious sense.

*sigh*

I didn't provide Einstein as a religious example. What you guys are doing is ASSUMING.

Now when I said I am talking about in a religious sense is science is a good guide but when you say "I am an athetist" you make science a type of religion. It is NOT. That's what I am trying to say!!

Answer 1

I understand men can be wrong about many things they study. Life itself is a miracle, but many today can't see that. Many believe they know everything about how things were created. Just fools believe there is no God. Earth and all creation is just to beautiful to be an accident.

Answer 2

For starters, here's some quotes from your man Einstein:
"I do not think that it is necessarily the case that science and religion are natural opposites. In fact, I think that there is a very close connection between the two. Further, I think that science without religion is lame and, conversely, that religion without science is blind. Both are important and should work hand-in-hand."

"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."
So.... your statement is pretty much unfounded in all its aspects.


You are trying to argue on a logical basis with those who have a rational- and not a faith-based worldview; however, your line of argument remains very illogical. This puts you in a very weak position.
You have no idea about gravity, for one - you still sound like you don't believe in it - are you writing to us from another planet?

Plenty of individual formulae tie together. I'ts an everday occurrence, in fact. Ever take a math or chemistry course? If you had, you'd understand how.

I am beginning to think you must be home-schooled.

How can you even rationalize using the internet?
I repeat from my old answer - unless you manufacture all of your personal items yourself (and I very much doubt it) - you are using science-based technology every day in your life. Get over it and go do something useful with your life.

Answer 3

All that means is that science hasn't finished yet. That's why we still have scientists. Using your logic, the existence of a time in which people (and therefore science) didn't exist would be proof that a god did.
As for the bit about Einstein, I could easily find you some quotes that demonstrate more clearly his views on religion, but I don't have to. Einstein was a brilliant physicist, that doesn't make him an authority on religion. I believe his scientific theories because he demonstrated them mathematically, with supporting evidence. He had no such evidence for any of his theological ideas.

I'm not sure I understand exactly what you're saying. When I say that I'm an atheist I'm making science a religion? How? I can't see any way in which atheism or science could be considered religious.

Answer 4

Actually, you aren't being correct (or honest) in your statements.
Most areas of physics (since it sounds as though you are speaking cosmological rather than biological) work together quite well.
What you are referreing to is the special case of a Grand Unified theory....one simple equation from which all others would be derivative.
What you should have said is that we aren't there yet, but there's every indication that we will get there within our lifetimes.
However, I don't think it means what you seem to think it does.
The fact that we will one day be able to explain any or even all processes via mathematics does not mean that, for example, a cure for cancer will then be coming immediately on its discovery.
Gravity is a law. It's for sure. It works here on earth, and it works around Neptune too....and those two places are very, very far apart.
My point here is that it sounds like you have a lot of assumptions about what science really is, and those don't seem to meet up with the reality of the situation.

Answer 5

Don't lie about Einstein. It seems that your SUPERIOR POWER doesn't like lying. Let's let old Albert speak for himself.

"I cannot imagine a God who rewards and punishes the objects of his creation, whose purposes are modeled after our own -- a God, in short, who is but a reflection of human frailty. Neither can I believe that the individual survives the death of his body, although feeble souls harbor such thoughts through fear or ridiculous egotisms."

"It seems to me that the idea of a personal God is an anthropological concept which I cannot take seriously. I also cannot imagine some will or goal outside the human sphere.... Science has been charged with undermining morality, but the charge is unjust. A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties and needs; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeed be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death."


PS - If you deny gravity's absolutism, pray to your God to to make you fly and go jump out 10 story window. Report your findings backk here. Gravity you can verify. A higher power will never be verified.

Answer 6

1. You persist in not understanding what a scientific theory means. To you it's still mysterious guesswork. (So the theory of aerodynamics means you'll never set foot on an airplane?)

2. Einstein didn't believe in any type of personal "god." You're taking the quotes out of context, but I don't think you're well-read enough to know it. Einstein used the word "god" similiar to the way Hawkings uses is - as ultimate force.

Answer 7

You don't think gravity has been proven? Have you ever jumped off the roof?

I think you're unfair to Einstein. General Relativity is an elegant explanation of gravity. It's been verified thousands of time in many different ways and not one bit of it has ever been disproved.

Answer 8

your question/answer is with the rational that there is a god or unexplainable force due to science advances having difficulties explaining, yet what gravity is

I would say that modern science is real close, same with light study and energy theory

when man understands gravity in same way as past discoveries and theories, what then?

Answer 9

when you become an atheist your going to be soooo attractive,

right now i wouldnt date you cause you know, the whole god delusion, but when you unplug from the matrix o man, its on

Answer 10

Oh the wonders of a blank mind and blind faith. I can't say I am impressed at all.