I dont feel America needs to send more troops in general, what we need is more trainers for the Iraqi Army, Iraqi National Guard and Iraqi Police. this is not necessarily the military, we can use outside help from our allies for sending trainers in, Iraq needs to start fending for itself and know that we cant be there forever, the longer we wait the more dependent they become on us.
2007-01-30 11:53:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by armyboysmith 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
This is a trick situation and this war in iraq is starting to look like vietnam mre and more everyday. President Bush, whether you like him or not and I personally dont, made a decision in which he thought was the best fo the country. that decision of course was to go into iraq. now the media on the left is calling it a quagmire and on the right a crusade leaving the american public with nothing but hot air to think about. We are in Iraq and people say we have to stay until the job is done. But at this point, what is the job? Are we rebuilding Iraqi infrastructure? We already did that when we establsiehd a goernment. Ar we fighting against Saddam's army? No they have all been defeated or are working for us now. Are we fighitng Al-Qaeda? No Al-Qaeda has little or no presence in Iraq in term of manpower. It is the Iraqis fighting the Iraqis and as Michael Savage said it best Mr. Bush has stuck his hand in between two dogs fighitng each other and there is no pissbile positive outcome. Thse so called Islamofacists view us as occupiers much like the vietnamese did. They beleive it is teir war to fight an we have to let them fight their war just like the vietnamese did. Ya iran is gonna invade after, but we should ahve went into iran and no iraq. I sopke to numerous iranians who fled to the us during the Iraq_iran war and they said that Iraninas all love western culture and they hate the government and if you gave them all guns they would overthrow the government themselves. Sounds good to me. But putting more troops in is not a big deal because it will be the same amount that was in December and November of last year. The thing is we as a people have tp decide what we are fighting for and when we ar doene fighitn for it. I beleive we should wait it out for the next two years and see in what direction Mr. Bush takes us in and there is no progress I beleive a change is in order to give more power to the iraiqs. This is the problem with iraq since it inception. Britian carved up Iraw into what it is now ignoring the fact that there are three differnt types of cultures that were in this new sovering nation. It can be compared to [utting blacks, racist whites, and chinese, in the same small area of a country. Of course there all gonna hate each other! That is why they needed a dictatorship ruled by fear to keep them cohesive and is why the United States supported Saddam up untl he invad their oil interests in Kuwait. But now Mr. Bushs bidding has been done and we have to accept it, but the beauty of democracy staes that if you dont like something you chage it. So like I said before I bleiev that the current amourn of trrops is fine and we shall see if progress has been made and if it hasnt i believe that the american people as well as the gis need a new direction
2007-01-30 19:29:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by sjdesai1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that I don't agree with you but I don't really know if you mean Iraq, if agins is supposed to mean against, whany translates to want and contry means country. If I figured out your shorthand, I think you're wrong.
2007-01-30 19:13:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Number one learn how to spell and let the grown ups handle the important stuff. Stop listening to to liberal teachers and realize if we do not keep fighting back, we will die. The Islmo-Fascists want to kill us and if we just quit in Iraq, they are going to win.
2007-01-30 19:13:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Damn Good Dawg 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I dissegreee wid yur qusston. send mor troopes
2007-01-30 19:21:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
"The pioneers of a warless world are the young men who refuse military service."
2007-01-31 12:19:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do. I think we should send 210,500 more troops.
2007-01-30 19:13:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i say bring them all home
2007-01-30 19:13:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by glamour04111 7
·
2⤊
2⤋