Do you agree? Give reasons to support your answer and show that you have thought about different points of view. You must refer to Christianity in your answer.
2007-01-30 10:38:15 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
As in the idea of euthanasia? No, I think if someone is suffering and they want to die with dignity, that should be their right. We put pets to sleep to save them from suffering when they have a terminal illness - why can't we we do the same for ourselves? And no I'm not going to refer to Christianity...even though I guess I just did ;)
2007-01-30 10:54:05 · answer #1 · answered by nuthnbettr2do0128 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Christianity in my answer. I am not sure of I can do that but here is my 2 cents worth. I personally dont hold with the view of keeping someone alive - on life support when they are in their 80's and when they in pain and just becuase we have this technology does not make it ok. However if someone was in a coma and we could keep them alive its a whole different thing. people have come out of comas. However elderly people should be allowed to die with as much grace and dignity as possible.
2007-01-30 19:04:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are not willing to accept non-Christian points-of-view? How close-minded of you.
Anyway, even though I believe there is no God I will answer your question hypothetically. It all comes down to God's Will. If God wanted a person to die, then no amount of human interference would matter. But it could be that he sent this particular person to save the dying one... so I think we should do all we can to prolong life and let God's Will have the final say...
2007-01-30 18:53:29 · answer #3 · answered by God Fears Me 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I must refer to Christianity? Sorry, can't
2007-01-30 18:51:54 · answer #4 · answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is wrong to interfere because, we are interfering with God's plan.
2007-01-30 19:22:15 · answer #5 · answered by Freedom 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋