2007-01-30 10:21:09 · 6 answers · asked by kunta kinte 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Genealogy
Racist aren't you?
2007-02-02 03:10:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh dear. The classifications you cited are not popularly utilized in science today to describe either the "outward appearance" of homo sapiens or our cultural, behavioral or physical differences and are considered quite insensitive except perhaps in craniofacial anthropology or zoology. But if you insist in using these rather disparaging terms, by sheer numbers, the dishonor must go to the "Caucasoid" group as the other two are approximately 41 percent of mankind. This, naturally, assumes that the "brown" races are part of the "Caucasoid" group rather than the "*******" or the "red" races are part of the "Mongoloid" groups as was done when this triad of races was developed some 250 years ago. Therefore, I would have to say, the answer is the human race, period.
2007-01-30 11:20:01 · answer #2 · answered by cranura 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No statistics available to reliably base an opinion but I don't think it would be too far out of the ball park to put your money on Caucasoid. Now don't get me wrong - I'm not prejudiced. In fact I am one myself. Why ? Because we need only to look more closely at the last 600 years, (which is much better documentated,) beyond Caucasoid-written history, to see a history written in blood. Charles Darwin once said that every where the whitemen has trod he has brought with him murder and destruction of societies and cultures. No, I'm not feeeling good about this.
2007-02-03 02:37:33 · answer #3 · answered by John M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How can anyone know that? Africans invaded Southern Europe over and over and over again...that's why southern Italians have dark, curly hair and northern Italians are blond and blue-eyed. African countries have been slaughtering each other for even longer. Genghis Kahn murdered millions and raped so many that 1/6 of the human population is related to him. United States Republican administrations have murdered millions for oil.
How can anyone know?..we weren't THERE thousands of years ago.
2007-02-02 08:48:35 · answer #4 · answered by H. Scot 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, let's see. Hitler killed about 6 million (not counting the opposing soldiers that were killed by the men under his command), Stalin killed about 12 million... and they were both white, so I'd say that puts Caucasoids in the lead by a wide margin...
and that's not counting the millions of Japanese killed by the atomic bombs ordered by Truman...
2007-01-30 10:26:32 · answer #5 · answered by bodinibold 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ghenghis Kahn, cultural revolution and rape of Nanking. Don't forget Pearl harbor. My Yen is on the Mongoloid.
2007-01-30 10:29:23 · answer #6 · answered by Billy Dee 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋