Because of the Evidence He did it. Him and about 50 People in the U.S. Govt and U.S. Military. You have to actually look at the evidence. Look at history, Hitlers Rightage Operation Northwoods, Operation AJAX, Operation Paperclip. Watch "TERRORSTORM" in google video.
My research &EVIDENCES:
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=76296974&blogID=160409200&MyToken=3e37dfdc-f9d0-4d05-92f6-b364743f5005
2007-01-30 09:55:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by warisascam 1
·
5⤊
4⤋
Ok if you pay attention to the annoying WTC videos that have to be played on TV 24/7 every September 11th anniversary the planes hit the first top floors. Now it should have just knocked off the top floors not the entire building. But if you notice the entire building collapsed within 5 seconds of the planes hitting the WTC. Now there is no known way a couple of planes stuck in the first top floors can knock an entire 110 story building down. So there must have been a bomb in the garage to knock the rest of the building down or someone pulled the buildings down. I don't understand why people don't use common sense and realize that but that's besides the point. Also there were firefighter and police crews there from other states within like 5-10 minutes after the 9/11 attacks. So don't you think they knew we were going to be attacked?
2007-01-30 20:51:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
This is why. It's the same reason why there are so many JFK assassination conspiracy theories. No one wanted to believe that some lone nut like Oswald could have taken down a powerful and influential leader like JFK. It doesn't seem right. You WANT to believe that in order to take down someone like JFK, you have to have a whole operation -- the Mafia involved, Castro involved, the Soviets involved. It seems to make more sense that way. It's the same thing with 9/11; how the hell can nineteen assholes with boxcutters do something that kills 3,000 people? You WANT to believe that it would have to take something like a whole massive conspiracy in order to pull off something of that magnitude. This is why you eventually get things like conspiracy theories. The official explanation is not enough -- 3,000 people are dead, and why? Because some guys got through airplane security? It doesn't feel right. It's not easy to accept. But it's what happened.
2007-01-30 18:10:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by . 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
If you want to argue that he orchestrated the Iraq war, fine.
Believing he orchestrated 9/11 is like believing in the bible. Sure you can find a random factoid here or there that is believable but when taken all together it's fiction.
2007-01-30 17:59:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dave P 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are right, they do not want to face the truth, because they would do anything to get Bush out of office today if possible.
grace2u
2007-01-30 18:06:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Theophilus 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I agree. He isn't anywhere near bright enough to orchestrate anything of that magnitude.
Cheney, on the other hand....
2007-01-30 18:00:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
honestly because they look for any reason to put a half way "decent" man out of office! Bush has taken this country forward, he made parchal birth abortion illegal people, he has done great things, why won't you except this? I am all for him, and I will be sad to see him step down in a few years
God bless the US, and the people that rule it, JUSTLY and FAIRLY!
Kat
2007-01-30 18:06:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kat 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I've looked at the silly evidence you pose. It's for retards.
2007-01-30 17:58:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Do you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that he wasn't or for that matter who was.
2007-02-07 15:10:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by CelticMoonGoddess 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Those are probably the same people who think the moon landing was fake.
2007-01-30 17:57:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋