because, you see, there's something called age of concent.
for sex.
and it's a very silly concept--- it says (in effect) the following
if you're under under sixteen (usually) if you have sex with somebody they're automatically raping you, why? I don't know.
(I'm 15).
at any rate,
2007-01-30 09:37:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by The greatest and the best. 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It does have to do with age of consent laws, which vary by state in the United States.
The focus is on those who would solicit children and try to meet them for sex. Sadly for some potential predators a 13 year old decoy is "too old" and not of interest.
2007-02-01 10:06:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Drew 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because 1) in some places 16 and 17 isn't illegal, 2) if the girl is younger then it makes the guy look like more of a sicko.
In the UK, 16 is the legal age, so right now the USA looks rather primitive as it is.
BTW Why don't they show any women pedophiles and try to trap them. They exist. There's one that lives next door to me.
2007-01-30 17:38:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by marklemoore 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think the true pedophiles prefer to get as close to a little girl in appearance and maturaty as possible. Look how many "barely legal" i.e. 18 year old Playboy Playmates there have been that look like full on women. The pedophiles go for a type, not necessarily an actual number.
2007-01-30 17:36:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
More of them would rather be with someone as young as they can get them, that is why they don't say they're older than 13-14. There are alot of 16-17 year old girls that look like women and they want someone younger than that. They're SICK like that!
2007-01-30 17:36:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by saturn man 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cause really the pedophiles look WAY WORSE the younger the decoys portray themselves as. Not only is it better television, but its easier to convict these freaks anyways.
2007-01-30 17:35:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sammy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL good question, but the decoy might sound pretty gullible for being 17 if they do that.
2007-01-30 17:35:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by youshouldbedead 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
idk... maybe 13-14-15-year-olds seem more vulnerable to them? That is unusual... I never realized it before.
2007-01-30 17:35:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ask Tara 3
·
0⤊
0⤋