English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just curious if the right is still clinging to that one....check back in a short while and you wont believe what you see.

2007-01-30 08:21:21 · 42 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

42 answers

Well I will be the first to throw a wrench in your theory; of course then again, I am far from right wing. I don’t for one believe Iraq had any involvement in 9/11, and those who think that Iraq was involved in 9/11 know nothing about current events, Islamic culture, and so are blinded by loyalty to the Bush administration to even hear their small dissenting voice deep in side of them, which is also referred to as common sense.

2007-01-30 08:26:03 · answer #1 · answered by Lawrence Louis 7 · 4 3

The Brits have checked this out very carefully, Saddam had nothing to do with it, nor is there a shred of evidence that Bin Ladens mad mob, or any other terrorist organisation operated in Iraq! with his knowledge..Hammas tryed to assassinate Saddam twice!..They did get one of his sons!..Nothing points to the despot at all to link him with 911..Even when he was interrogated by US investigators they found not a thing to incriminate him on that one!..Logic tells you that he would never support the insane terrorists..They were always trying to kill him!..All Saddam was, was a typical Middle Eastern 'strongman'!..Try Qaddafi and any amount of other rulers in the region and you'll see Saddam was no more evil than the rest are!..That's the truth of the matter, putting stupid 'political spins' and bald faced open mouthed lies on it might fool some who dont want to think about it , or seek out reality..They wont listen, no matter how irrefutable the evidence is!..Let them live in their fantasy world.!....

2007-01-30 12:31:35 · answer #2 · answered by paranthropus2001 3 · 0 0

The September 11, 2001 attacks consisted of a series of coordinated terrorist suicide attacks by Islamic extremists on the United States. The victims were predominantly civilians.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, nineteen terrorists affiliated with al-Qaeda hijacked four commercial passenger jet airliners. Each team of hijackers included a trained pilot. The hijackers crashed two of the airliners (United Airlines Flight 175 and American Airlines Flight 11) into the World Trade Center in New York City, one plane into each tower (1 WTC and 2 WTC), resulting in the collapse of both buildings soon afterward. A nearby church and the rest of the World Trade Center complex's seven buildings were also destroyed or damaged beyond repair. A third airliner (American Airlines Flight 77) was crashed into the Pentagon in Arlington County, Virginia. Passengers and members of the flight crew on the fourth aircraft (United Airlines Flight 93) attempted to retake control of their plane from the hijackers; that plane crashed into a field near the town of Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania. In addition to the 19 hijackers, 2,973 people died; another 24 are missing and presumed dead.

Nuff said!

2007-01-30 08:58:16 · answer #3 · answered by KC V ™ 7 · 1 1

No and no one of importance ever said that Iraq was behind 9/11. Saddam had allowed terrorist training camps in Iraq and so when a war on terror is declared (even if that is too vague) then Saddam would be a logical target.

2007-01-30 08:51:46 · answer #4 · answered by joevette 6 · 1 0

No one from Iraq had anything to do with 9/11. I guess that we just invaded them because we perceived them to be the weakest! Little did we know that we were going to start a Civil War. If you notice It is mostly the Shiites & Sunnis that are battleing. The Kurds are staying out of this maddness. While Hussen was the ruler of Iraq, he was a Sunni & so his people did much harm to the majority Shiites. It's payback time, they figure.

2007-01-30 08:37:15 · answer #5 · answered by geegee 6 · 1 1

no man or woman who grow to be listening to Bush believes Iraq grow to be in the back of 9/11. the in hardship-free words those who have self assurance Iraq grow to be in the back of 9/11 are those who've believed the liberal lie that Bush reported Iraq grow to be in the back of 9/11. some each body is gullible adequate to have self assurance liberal lies and picture that Bush extremely did say Iraq grow to be in the back of 9/11, even regardless of the reality that each and each wise and counseled man or woman is time-honored with of Bush not in any respect reported this style of element. If liberals ought to offer up telling lies about Bush then gullible people would not be fooled and ought to hear the reality and have self assurance it extremely of believing liberal lies. As for WMD, Israel those days destroyed some in Syria. humorous how Syria has not cried to the UN claiming Israel did something incorrect. how are you going to attempt to demonize Israel at the same time as Syria knew better effective than to ***** about the strike? purely be satisfied that you're being secure via Bush. awaken and scent the jihad...

2016-12-03 06:13:01 · answer #6 · answered by gnegy 4 · 0 0

9/11 has been linked to Al-Queda and Osama Bin Laden - not one specific country. But it is believed that Sadam supported the terrorist group with funding....and it's also believed that the American government supported Bin Laden. More than likely Bin Laden had his hands in the pocket of Iran and Saudi Arabia too. So either directly or indirectly, all of these countries (and many more I'm sure) have some guilt. So Who was behind 9/11? Let's ask who WASN'T behind 9/11.

2007-01-30 08:28:41 · answer #7 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 1 3

No, but, the way things are going Iraq will probably have something to do with the next big terrorist event in the world just because it has been so miserably botched by our leaders.

I feel so badly for our servicemen and women.

2007-01-30 08:29:32 · answer #8 · answered by Charlie 2 · 2 1

G"day
No it was not behind 9/11
Iraq was a cleanup job from Daddy's Watch. Sonny Know he could kick Iraq's butt and get Saddam out. Look at the mess your now in cause of Bush

2007-01-30 08:38:20 · answer #9 · answered by Aussie1 2 · 1 2

The "right" never claimed that. Only a few deluded souls and the liberal main stream media. The problem is that your side is not smart enough to grasp the "war on terror" angle of the whole thing. Research Saddam's support for suicide bombers IE: terrorists. Who know, you may finally learn something.

2007-01-30 10:34:37 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers