English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could it be... SATAN!?

2007-01-30 05:43:13 · 21 answers · asked by The Church Lady 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

21 answers

the flying spagetti monster

2007-01-30 05:50:39 · answer #1 · answered by Arnar 2 · 5 1

Your basic premise is in error. Firstly, the reader should once again (ad nauseum) be reminded that the idea of evolution, though taught by educators (indoctrinators) with a liberal bent as fact...is still only an unproven THEORY. Thus, it is still "The Theory of Evolution".
Secondly, this theory is certainly NOT supported by any unearthed fossil remains. There are numerous animal species which have ceased to thrive and have died out throughout history. In fact, many have become extinct just in our own short lifetimes. Do those bones also "support" evolution?
Satan?...planting fossils? Unlikely. He's too busy with pulling the wool over the eyes of yet more so-called "intellectuals".





Who "planted" fossils? Ok....??? I give up.

2007-01-30 06:29:12 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. J 3 · 0 1

Evolution is a proved fact (details on request), and the proof has nothing to do with fossils. Fossils are a convenient means of learning the evolutionary history (and particularly its timing) of any species. But the more interesting evidence with respect to evolutionary history derives from genetics. The notion of Satan is silly.
For a discussion of the mechanics of evolution, see [1]. For an evolutionary history of life on earth, see [2]. For a discussion of the existence or non-existence of god, see [3].

2007-01-30 05:55:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

"If it incredibly is authentic there could be greater residing species then existed traditionally." Nope. As situations in the international substitute, so will the form of species. now and back there'll be a super number of different temperatures and habitats, so a super number of species will advance as they're going to substitute into appropriate to a super number of locations. now and back there won't, and the Earth will in basic terms be able to assist some species in assessment. additionally, if a species can't shop up with the way the international variations and can't evolve rapid sufficient to stay to tell the story in the recent habitat, it is going to pass extinct. it incredibly is a undemanding failure on your be conscious of-how of evolution, so all you may do is do a dash greater examining. there's a super form of stuff available- merely like there is not any sturdy info for advent. And undergo in strategies, despite if evolution substitute into proved incorrect, that would not advise Biblical advent (or that of the Quran, or something) is the main appropriate answer.

2016-10-16 07:31:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Would anyone care to point out some fossils that support evolution? Because I can't think of any...
All the 'missing links' between man and apes are humans, apes, or frauds.
In fact, there's a lot of animals out there that seem to be pretty decent stumbling blocks to evolution.
E.g. The Bat: How could the bat have evolved? I'm guessing it would have come from some rodent-like mammal (considering it's body structure). So, somewhere along the line, its front legs start evolving into wings...this would probably take millions, or at least hundreds of thousands of years.
But what happens in the meantime? Over the course of millions of years and thousands of generations, you have a species that is completely helpless - it's front limbs are useless for moving, eating, flying, anything...if you take natural selection into account, this species would go EXTINCT.
Sorry, it doesn't make sense =P

2007-01-30 05:57:21 · answer #5 · answered by Ryu Habayusa 4 · 0 2

A great deal of soil got moved as a result of the Great Flood, burying a lot of things very deep, but the problem is in dating the fossils. One of the theories about the moon is that it is a captured rouge planetoid that would have caused major changes in the Earth's environment. Radiographic dating is still based on a theory and cannot be reproduced in the lab or confirmed using empirical data.

As for the so called missing link skulls, have you ever though that they may be the skulls of the children of the fallen angels? They were consider large and almost like animals. Their fathers were beings whose base form was intelligent energy, so the atomic structure of their children may have been different from other humans.

2007-01-30 06:12:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

First, the 'Cambrian explosion'...... the millions of fossil types in Cambrian rock (oldest fossil bearing rocks) appear suddenly and fully formed and without any previous forms...IOW, there are no transitional forms.

Most well educated evolutionists, when forced to, will admit it, but very unwillingly, and even then they always want to seem to make new excuses for it. Usually they just don't say anything about it and hope noone finds out.

In reality the fossil record supports Genesis.

The thing to remember is that evolution is still just a theory - a hypothesis, a speculation, an unproven assumption.

According to Scripture NOTHING evolved but everything was created "AFTER THEIR KIND"....

2007-01-30 05:53:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

No one planted them, they occur naturally by first dying then being covered in (usually) silt, and over millions of years subjected to enormous pressure which turns the original creature/ plant into stone. Any other explanation is unsupportable. And for those who say that evolution is only a theory, let them continue to believe the folklore and myth of the Bible.

2007-01-30 05:54:31 · answer #8 · answered by Duffer 6 · 1 0

I'm a Christian and that's silly. God left us the fossil records. I'm glad to hear that you admit there is proof of evolution. You can be a Christian and not a creationalist. I've been saved 31 years and have found evolution to co-incide perfectly with the bible. That really irks me that you would be that desperate to defend your view of creationalism that you would say there IS proof but it's of "Satan".

2007-01-30 05:50:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

That's most all the purpose in the life of the Great Yeti Klan to do this as the space aliens told us to .and pay us to.with trade goods.as they mated with some of our females many years ago and anyways, your the result, a mixture of us and them, so they want for y'all to have this Christian belief so they might control you better & come take your children for slaves.so thats about all we do in our vast underground citys is make these fossils, I am Forest Sky Yeti the 17th,and as It is written. so be it ,this is so according to the great book of the Yeti.
demons do exist! we have some in our zoo.

2007-01-30 05:54:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Nope, it was Johnny Appleseed, cause he got bored just planting seeds all the time.

For the guy who answered above me, I'm sorry to break this to you, but evolution is still a theory, meaning it has not yet been proven. Sorry but you're dead wrong.

2007-01-30 05:56:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers