This question is in response to the answers I received from my first question ( Why are scientists concerned about icebergs melting when simple physics proves that melting ice actually lowers the levels of the water that it resides in). Most answers were decent enough (excluding the arrogant self righteous response from snootymcp), but I'm still not completely satisfied. I understand the logic behind landlocked ice melting, resulting in water levels rising. However, logic also insisits that if the temperatures were warm enough to melt the landlocked ice, the ice that resided in the water would melt as well. This occurence would actually lower water levels. Is it reasonable then, to assume that the landlocked ice would outweigh the effects from the melting icebergs (water bound ice)?
2007-01-30
05:36:21
·
3 answers
·
asked by
bo diddly
2
in
Environment