English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Is withdrawal viable? Is more troops going to help Iraq be self-sustaining? What's up?

2007-01-30 05:22:58 · 20 answers · asked by djdjr01 3 in Politics & Government Military

20 answers

a bright flash over Iran

2007-01-30 05:27:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

The only solution I can see is to send in Troops / Artillery / Aerial assaults with all guns blazing on places where the sh*t stirring terrorists causing all the problems are holed up, without giving a cr*p about who we upset in the process, seeing as the extremists doing all these attacks in Iraq are too stubborn & hard headed to listen to reason, which makes negotiations NOT a viable option.

Also someone needs to pin the 2 main leaders of Iran + Syria up against a wall and tell it to 'em straight to knock some sense into them.

Withdrawal probably WILL NOT be a viable option for another few years, otherwise theres a chance these extremists will take over the country, and we end up with another rogue state like North Korea or post-war Vietnam after them 2 wars............. if that happens, all the war + the deaths will have been for nothing, and we'd be back to square one trying to keep the damn place in check to keep peace in the Middle-East like post GulfWar1 like we were before we removed Saddam .

2007-01-30 05:46:57 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This was a huge mistake to begin with, this is a war of religion on this part of land been going on before Christ, now if Jesus left and they continued to fight, What makes anyone think that this is going to change. Yes we need to help countriess that need help like Africa, and the depressed, even our own countrie would be nice for a change, so many homeless, and don't say let them get a job yes I agree but no way can they survive on what some people call pay roll, we have outsourced so many jobs, it is pitiful, and those outsource jobs are credited to what Bush says there are so many jobs he has created since he has been in office. There are so many foreclosed homes than ever before. My mother of 87 at the time was taxed right out of her house. I'm off the issue sorry Sending more troops will only relive the troops that are there and will help them come home, for the minute the last American is out of this country they will go back to how it began, it is sad but it is the truth.

2007-01-30 05:47:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

i develop into having the same theory approximately Iraq. If the foreign places none Islamic Forces left the country or a minimum of grew to become much less seen might it take the countless warmth off the country. The forces might might desire to be obtainable to handle confusing factors as mandatory. i'm particular that is being given some theory. optimistically some thank you to handle the insurrection in Iraq will look so everybody can flow abode and go away the Iraqis to rebuild thier lives.

2016-11-01 21:38:26 · answer #4 · answered by barn 4 · 0 0

Victory. That is the only solution. The combat leaders must be allowed to adapt strategy to adjust to each move the enemy makes. Ground troops must have the rules of engagement changed to a victory stance and not a politically correct one that has been thrust upon them.

Leaders in this country should phrase their objections in a way that does not embolden the enemy.

I was looking at the words of Tokyo Rose and it is almost comical how closely her words mimic the words of the American left.

Without a victory we will be forced to return AGAIN, this time to an even stronger opponent. There is no running, there is no hiding, if we leave they will follow.

2007-01-30 05:30:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The solution is to withdraw from Iraq and to give the real Iraqis(not the pro-Iranian who lead Iraq now) real opportunity to solve their own problem.
Iraqi people does not trust now the American and the Iraqi government created by US occupation .Therefore USA should admit its mistakes by giving that opportunity to the nationalists who consider the interest of Iraq as the first priority in their thinking and behavior.USA now is aware of those nationalists very well .

2007-01-30 05:55:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Send 100000 troops, cut off Iran's involvement, go house to house and sweep up all weapons. Let them go back to throwing rocks. If Beorge gets them there like LBJ did Vietnam then he can leave it to the democrates to get them out, take the fall for it not working and they once again can take the BACK seat in congress to the way it used to be. Either that or just f-u-c-king leave.

2007-01-30 05:44:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Put all parties at the table and divide up Iraq as soon as we all agree who gets what part we the US leaves Iraq and go home and hopefully never do this again.

2007-01-30 05:41:58 · answer #8 · answered by brian L 6 · 0 0

Put it to a vote of the people of Iraq, whether to stay or pull out, then let them deal with the consequences.

2007-01-30 05:35:06 · answer #9 · answered by brd 2 · 0 0

It will not get better with Iran and Syria helping the terrorists and weapons flow into Iraq. I think we should put them in line.

2007-01-30 05:31:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Pull back to a desert location and let them fight it out. When the situation cools down, take it from there. But i have no long term solution.

And more UN responsibility.

2007-01-30 05:28:44 · answer #11 · answered by robert2020 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers