Why do they think 99% of biologists are wrong about evolution yet accept without question that they are qualified to do research into medical treatments and vaccines?
2007-01-30 05:09:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
The evolution, nay, the existence of viruses and other bugs is false so is the immunization and flu shots.
The flu is caused by a peasant sneezing the reproductive spirit of a demon from their nose onto the head of the of the person they wish to curse, thus blocking the grace of the one true mighty.
Without this grace the evil flesh causes misery and pain to the obviously impious victim which manifest as the symptoms of flu.
No needle will break this curse, prayer is all that is needed to absolve the flesh and the spirit, but, only after a sneeze is delivered from the pew upon a fellow citizen with questionable morals.
2007-01-30 05:16:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by voodooprankster 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
outstanding me if i'm incorrect, yet I continually theory that a flu shot grew to become right into a shot with a splash dose of the comparable ailment or despite that grew to become into injected into the physique so the immune gadget ought to are conscious of it and combat it off if the flu ever got here into the physique. I have no clue how that's even remotely touching directly to evolution. and that i in my view won't have the ability to think of of one clarification why those human beings who reject evolution could use an action to contradict ourselves or our ideals. except of direction that's taking a attempt on the meant "enormous Bang" in an Earth technological information type.
2016-11-23 14:14:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sadly, even in my fairly enlightened but muddy country there are some that do. No polio shots for kids and all.
Here's the blurb:
"The other vaccination scandal in Europe, particularly in the Netherlands, concerns poliomyelitis. Between September 1992 and February 1993, 71 individuals in the Netherlands contracted the disease. Two died and 59 were paralyzed. All but one belonged to an extreme Protestant sect that rejects immunization. "
http://newsarchive.asm.org/mar01/animalcule.asp
It got me so mad at the time and really, it still does. Unforgivable.
2007-01-30 05:17:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Everyone (even Christians) believe there is change within the kinds over time. No one rejects that. Creationists reject the idea that one kind will ever turn into another kind (Ape to man.. lizard to bird) medicine only involves microevolution (changes in bacteria, mold, blood etc) not one single medical practice are based on man having come from Apes.
2007-01-30 05:11:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by impossble_dream 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually I reject both the "My dad's a monkey!!" theory and those shots! Why put that poison into your mind and body?
2007-01-30 05:14:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Religious fanatics are in love with their ignorance. Blinding themselves to the reality of evolution is just a beginning. There's now a group of fundies (in Kansas, naturally) who are denying that Earth rotates on its axis and revolves around the Sun. I'm sure there are probably some fundies who will argue that the Earth is flat.
2007-01-30 05:10:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by fra59e 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yeah. Where would we be if medical science didn't keep track of virus MUTATIONS? Diseases become resistant to antibiotics and vaccines by evolving into resistant forms, and if nobody "believed in" evolution, we'd all be dead.
I notice that the number of ad hominem attacks you receive in response to a question positively correlates with the astuteness of the question.
2007-01-30 05:09:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Just because you call adaptation or mutation evolution doesn't mean one species is turning into another. It's just changes within a species and everyone believes in that.
May God Bless you.
2007-01-30 05:22:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do all scientists accept all components of the theory of evolution? No, you mean there's still quite a bit of debate going on in the scientific community? Hmmm...then why should non-scientists be expected to blindly accept all parts of it?
2007-01-30 05:08:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Open Heart Searchery 7
·
3⤊
2⤋