English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Okay, forgive me for being a moron....plants do need carbon dioxide right to survive right, to turn into oxygen? It's been about 10 years since I've had a science course and back then I didn't exactly pay attention.

2007-01-30 00:58:15 · 6 answers · asked by boz4425 4 in Environment

6 answers

Volcanoes spew out more CO2 than humans do even with all of our gas guzzling vehicles.

2007-01-30 01:01:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if the comprehensive earth flooded the salinity of the water might desire to be decreased. There might desire to be no sparkling water, so any aquatic existence that relies upon on sparkling water does now no longer have the potential to stay to tell the story. the extra advantageous suited quantity of water might replace how and the situation ocean currents lie, and the time-honored temperature of the water might desire to be bigger than together as there is land indoors the way, so the polar caps might soften inflicting the decrease back in salinity. in effect all aquatic existence might have been wiped out. How did noah get 2 blue whales on the ark?

2016-12-16 16:54:43 · answer #2 · answered by miracle 4 · 0 0

volcanic eruptions and naturally occurring forest fires produce carbon dioxide. so yes they would survive

2007-01-30 01:03:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If the plants don't have CO2 we don't have oxygen are fossil fuels. The plants recycle our air and fossil fuels.

2007-01-30 02:52:57 · answer #4 · answered by JOHNNIE B 7 · 0 0

yess,because then their will be humans to give carbondioxide for the plants as humans also give of CO2.

2007-01-30 01:08:17 · answer #5 · answered by Ashwajit A 1 · 0 0

yes

2007-01-30 01:01:40 · answer #6 · answered by booge 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers