ATHEISTS: Prove to me there is no God?

Answer 1

OK, God! God! Where are you? Could you come here a minute? No? Why? What's that? You're not real. Oh, I see. Oh well, off to science class.

Answer 2

Going by your capitalisation, I assume you're talking about either the Christian or Jewish God. And judging by your other questions, it seems you're probably talking about the Christian version.
It's really very simple to prove that the Christian God doesn't exist. Let's start from the beginning. The bible says that God created everything about 6000 years ago, over a period of 6 days in essentially its current form. It has been clearly shown that 1) the universe, this planet and life are all older than that; 2) they were not created in their current forms; 3) they were not all created within six days, some things are billions of years older than others.
Q.E.D.

The people saying that the burden of proof is with the theists are entirely correct. And while it's very simple to disprove God, it's impossible to disprove the existence of 'a god'. This is because a god does not, by definition, exist in a physical sense or impact on anything in an observable or measurable way. But there has never been any solid evidence to suggest that any god does exist.

Answer 3

It is very hard to believe that god was magically there and made the earth out of nothing. People have the right to believe in any stuff they want. If people say atheists are going to hell then let them go. why worry about stuff you can't change. There would be proof on earth if god really want people to believe in him more. You can not say the bible is the proof when man wrote it.

Answer 4

BELIEVER: 'Preaching' is a prerogative of Believers; we, Atheists, don't feel compelled to convince you of anything because the TRUTH is so evident for anyone to see that there's no need to bring forth arguments or preach as YOU feel compelled to do instead, since you have no evidences at all supporting your Faith;)

Evidences? You want evidences? READ. Begin with Sumerian tablets, learn astronomy, archaeology, antrolpology, philology, ancient history, a bit of genetics, physics and chemistry, and you'll find all the evidences you're looking for;) READ, abandon the DEEP IGNORANCE in which you were raised, OPEN YOUR EYES and MIND and the TRUTH will display right before your eyes.

Answer 5

It's not on us to prove there is no god. Theists are the ones making a claim that there is a god... they are the ones with the burden of proof. Can you prove to me that there is no flying spaghetti monster? or Bigfoot?

It falls upon those making the claim to support their claim.

Answer 6

see rather than give you a conclusive evidence that there is no Higher Intellect that is God created us, they know that they can not disprove to us the faith that we share in the one true God, they cowar in fear and quickly attack us with the simple task of saying prove to us there is one. they run to science to help solve their problems when clearly, their own "theories" as they call them rely on just as much faith as u and i have in God. they look at the theory of evolution and say well there is evidence that supports evolution, but what the so called intellects neglect is that there is evidence that could clearly not result in the cration of the random, transformation of one being into the other, there are in fact two types of evolution, some think that we evolve into different species completely and some think that we just adapt to our surroundings, let me remind you that "adaptation" is not even close to the same theory of evolution. most people take this adaptation into their knowledge and claim it is evolution. no it is not and for some people out there you are going to tell me to go back to science classes and restudy this, well my friend it is you that needs to go back. if adaptation and evolution were the same then how can a fish come out of the water and adapt to the dry land. when now as fish come up they die. here are a few animals that disprove the evolution theory....
ELEPHANT
FISH
EYES
GIRAFFE
INSECT THAT HAS FLAMMABLE SUBSTANCE THAT IT SHOOTS OUT OF BUTT
and that is just a few, then there is the ever so popular river that carved the Grand Canyon, this is virtually impossible because then the river at some point would have to flow uphill, when is the last time that you have seen this?
then we come to the big bang theory, so rather than believe that there is a God, they put their trust in the theory that a particle of matter, became superheated spun around and spontanuosly popped and thus creating the universe and all that is in it.
well it doesn't make since and it takes faith, therefore i would classify athiesm as a religion, so good day and remember

God is real, i have faith. and for those who don't just keep on walking and hold your head up. someday we shall all find the truth.

Answer 7

It's you who likes the idea of proof. Well prove we weren't all created by the Flying Spaghetti Monster last Thursday, with all our memories intact, and I'll get back to you with my proof about your god.

Answer 8

To say "I believe there is no God" is a conscious choice. Then, on what do you base your choice: evidence, logic, faith, or a combination of the three?
If evidence, then what positive evidence is there that disproves God's existence?
There can be no such evidence since evidence is physical in nature (evidence is an effect and/or result of something in reality). How could evidence disprove God's existence who is, by definition, the creator of reality and separate from it?
(I am defending the Christian God as revealed in the Bible).
Testimony is admissible in court as evidence, but no one can rightly testify that God does not exist.
If logic then what logical proof do you have that negates God's existence?
At best, logic can only disprove theistic proofs. Disproving theistic proofs does not mean there is no God. It only means that the proofs thus presented are insufficient.
Logic can only disprove theistic proofs that are presented and negating such proofs is not a refutation of all possible proofs since no one can know or present all possible proofs of God's existence. Therefore, negation of proofs does not disprove God's existence.
If there were a logical argument that proved that God did not exist, it either has not yet been made known. If it were known then it would be in use by atheists. But since no proof of God's non-existence has been successfully defended by atheists, we can conclude that thus far, that there are no logical proofs for God's non-existence.
If faith alone, then the position is not held by logic or evidence and is an arbitrary position.
If by a combination of evidence, logic, and/or faith, then according to the above analysis, neither is sufficient to validate atheism. A combination of insufficient means does not validate atheism.
For someone to believe there is no God is to hold that belief by faith since there is no evidence that positively supports atheism and there are no logical proofs that God does not exist. It is, after all, virtually impossible to prove a negative.

Answer 9

nuh uh buddy. If you want to believe in invisible pink unicorns the burden of proof is on you.

We're waiting.

(here is a hint, the only proof that you have that god exists is that we can't prove he doesn't. Which isn't proof at all)

Answer 10

*sigh*
Sorry, but the burden of proof remains with those who believe. You can't prove non-existence (for the millionth time). We're not the ones trying to make a point.

Answer 11

Read the book The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins. You will get the proof