Some women inherit genes from their parents that are more resistant to damage and cancer than others. Those whose genes do not provide as much protection against cancer are said to be genetically susceptible to the disease. Scientists have shown that some cancers (i.e., breast cancer) involve genes that are passed down from parents to their children, and the link between such genetic mutations and lung cancer is also becoming more probable. But the link to heredity has not been absolutely confirmed in lung cancer.
My suggestions are don't smoke, drink, or do drugs, and get regular check-ups...
2007-01-29 23:39:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by iheartbassets3 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lo_mcg has a good answer. To add a number of ideas: 1) each person does now not have a cancer cellphone in them, and each person does not have a cancer gene. We all have genes that can go bad at any factor, though. A few of us, maybe 10%, are born with one already dangerous, so our chances of getting melanoma increase vastly. 2) Most lung melanoma "households" have anything more than genes in long-established- it's smoking. Quitting doesn't lower your danger to zero unfortunately. 2d-hand smoke is an hassle as well that can give an explanation for non-smoking lung melanoma sufferers. Benefits
2016-08-10 14:20:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It means that you should let your doctor know what you have found out. There is a very high chance you may get some kind of cancer. So that when you get sick and go in, he knows the history and can check for this instead of trying to guess about it. There is NO telling that you will actually get cancer, just the chances are higher than the average person. I'v got the same problem.
2007-01-29 23:41:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Shari 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
lo_mcg has a competent answer. to function some innovations: a million) everyone does no longer have a maximum cancers cellular in them, and each physique does no longer have a maximum cancers gene. all of us have genes that could circulate undesirable at any element, nevertheless. some people, perhaps 10%, are born with one already undesirable, so our opportunities of having maximum cancers enhance severely. 2) maximum lung maximum cancers "households" have something better than genes in trouble-free- that's smoking. Quitting does not shrink your threat to 0 regrettably. 2d-hand smoke is an argument besides that could clarify non-smoking lung maximum cancers sufferers. advantages
2016-09-28 04:40:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Reviewing your genealogy, it might be. But also check the quality of air you breathe (as well as your family's). Your chronic bronchitis and two cases of pneumonia suggests you really need to take care of your lungs. It's not yet too late to start taking care of your health ;D
2007-01-29 23:39:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by highshadow07 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
cancer has been found out to be hereditary so i would have this checked out every two years.
2007-01-30 00:06:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by duc602 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
my friend listen: the herediy exist but if u dont give the heredity the "fuel" to run , it doesnt run in you, so read about ( macrobiotic diet ) you have to see the other way of life, change your than your heredity will change with you,
best answer no ??
2007-01-29 23:42:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋