English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Governments have fairly adequate system for radioactive materials storage, containmetn and disposal of radioactive waste.

The most common issue on radioactive materials is accidents or accidental exposure to the substance.

2007-01-29 12:59:24 · answer #1 · answered by Willie Boy 5 · 0 0

the government genuinely already has a radioactive waste disposal internet site that makes use of the belief of disposal in salt, that's stated as the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. i grew to become into able to take a excursion of the ability, and the belief is genuinely quite captivating. The salt will needless to say strengthen around the drums to thoroughly envelope them and, because of the fact that's salt, there are no concerns approximately water transporting an infection removed from the positioning. additionally, whilst the positioning is ultimately closed, the government plans on putting a number of categories of markers to warn destiny generations of what's buried there. of direction, i discover it hard to have faith that anybody will want to dig a nil.5 mile down it the middle of the desolate tract, yet howdy, you never understand. I, for one, can not understand the way radioactive waste disposal could be seen unethical. whether you compromise with nuclear means or no longer, actuality is that we already have loads of this waste that has been generated. What could be unethical is only to proceed ignoring the situation subsequently very much increasing the possibility of exposure from the waste it quite is at the instant saved in centers that weren't designed for long term storage or disposal.

2016-11-23 13:07:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

An actual or potential release of radioactive material at a commercial nuclear power plant or a transportation accident or other radiological incident. An uncontrolled release of hazardous or toxic materials capable of posing a risk to public health, safety or the environment.

Radioactive waste is waste type containing radioactive chemical elements that does not have a practical purpose. It is sometimes the product of a nuclear process, such as nuclear fission. The majority of radioactive waste is "low-level waste", meaning it has low levels of radioactivity per mass or volume. This type of waste often consists of items such as used protective clothing, which is only slightly contaminated but still dangerous in case of radioactive contamination of a human body through ingestion, inhalation, absorption, or injection. In the US alone, the DOE acknowledges that there are "millions of gallons of radioactive waste" as well as "thousands of tons of spent nuclear fuel and material" and also "huge" quantities of contaminated soil and water. The Fernald site in Florida for example had "31 million pounds of uranium product", "2.5 billion pounds of waste", "2.75 million cubic yards of contaminated soil and debris", and a "223 acre portion of the underlying Great Miami Aquifer had uranium levels above drinking standards". The United States currently has at least 108 sites it currently designates "sacrifice zones", areas that are contaminated and unusable, sometimes many thousands of acres[American Scientist Jan/Feb 2007](&DOE)[1] The DOE wishes to try and clean or mitigate many by 2025, however it acknowledges that some will never be completely remediated, and just in one of these 108 larger designations, Oak Ridge, there were for example at least "167 known contaminant release sites" in one of the three subdivisions of the 37,000 acre site. Some of the US sites were smaller in nature, however, and cleanup issues were simpler to address. The issue of disposal methods for nuclear waste was one of the most pressing current problems the valuable international nuclear industry faced when trying to establish a long term energy production plan, yet there was hope it could be safely solved. In the US, the DOE acknowledged much progress in addressing the waste problems of this vital and critical industry, and successful remediation of some contaminated sites, yet also complications and setbacks in handling the issue properly and cost effectively. In other countries with lower ability or will to maintain environmental integrity the issue would be more problematic.

2007-01-29 12:43:26 · answer #3 · answered by Vergil D 2 · 0 0

Look up your RCRA statutes. Its all listed in those.

2007-01-29 12:39:27 · answer #4 · answered by tchem75 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers