they've BEEN there, theyve suffered, they've been forced to kill innocent people, how do you think they feel
2007-01-29 11:38:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eduardo h 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
The Iraqi War veterans protest what is supposed to be given by the government and what to do with the Iraq conflict.
2007-01-29 11:31:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
There could be any amount of troops supporting the war but do you think CNN or any other news agency would take an image like that to press? Hell no!! But you get a couple protesting the war and you would think the entire military was about to desert. The media is killing this country with biased reporting. It is that way in everything. If you believe everything the media spews out I would like to sell you some prime real estate in SE Florida.
2007-01-29 17:09:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Combatcop 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Listening to CNN, you would think there was a large percentage of troops protesting, but that is far from the truth.
There was a Soldier who lost a leg in Iraq that Counter-protested. Do you think he was trying to tell us something? I do, but the Libs won't listen. (I was paraphrasing you and another answerer above me)
The press can make whatever point they choose, and they have always chosen the view most likely to harm anything Bush touched.
2007-01-29 11:41:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
That group is a small, make that very small, percentage of the troops that have served. I'd be willing to wager that more troops have volunteered for second tours in Iraq/Afghanistan than were are the protest and probably be a large margin.
2007-01-29 15:22:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by k3s793 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
you're authentic approximately Jane Fonda; Walter Cronkite screw us sturdy by saying the Vietnam conflict substitute into unwinnable through Tet Offensive of 1968. information adult adult males are think to record the information, not make it. pass forward and do despite it incredibly is which you have faith to be the main appropriate element, yet make beneficial of your info in the past you act. a super form of the Veterans I pay attention that have grew to become against the conflict have been incapable of say 'we' in referencing their fellow provider adult adult males, yet greater advantageous than able to asserting 'I' as in I fought this evil conflict on my own. regrettably, extremely some "Veterans" the anti-conflict stream has embraced to this factor as their spokesmen have grew to become out to be the two phonies, wannabees or disciplinary challenge that have been given bounced out of the provider for one reason or yet another.
2016-10-16 06:51:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by machey 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
My best bet is that the Iraq war verterans have come to terms that this war is a false flag operation. The only intended goal is for more power and more control of the middle east. Thousands upon thousands of soldiers have lost their lifes, and for what. Nothing, it's total mass murder. Bush just got all the Americans behind him when they said they're linked w/ Al-(CIA)aida, so we must decimate that country and bring it into our corrupt way of government in the name of terror.
2007-01-29 11:33:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
2⤊
4⤋
According to bush's logic it's because the Iraq war veterans don't support the troops. How STUPID does that sound conservatives?
2007-01-29 11:30:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
Yep, you are so right but Neo-Cons won't listen to American Veterans.
They only listen to war profiteers.
.
2007-01-29 11:31:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brotherhood 7
·
4⤊
3⤋