Are u at fault in an auto accident , if you are reversing and the poeple in back of you keep going?

Question

i was in an accident in california, i was blockin someones way out of a parking lot so i reversed to let them out , the car in back of me kept moving forward as i was reversing? so who is at fault? me? him? or both of us?
* they were also drinking and didnt have proof of insurance present?

Answer 1

If you're reversing and involved in an accident, you are at fault. Always.
It happened to me when a buddy saw I was leaving and he pulled in behind me to get my attention (Basically he cut me off). I dinged his Corvette door. It ended up costing me $1,600.00.

The insurance man said that it's always the guy backing up who pays.

Answer 2

YIKES-

when i see LOTS of wrong answers i cant help but put my two cents in because i hate when people mislead people when they dont know what they are talking about.

1. I dont know where people got that parking lot accidents are no ones fault and everyone has to pay their own damages. Thats a ridiculous myth. Parking lot accidents get investigated like any other accident and a liability decision is made.

2. The other driver is NOT 100% at fault as someone said. In fact, you will be the majority at fault if not 100% at fault. The othe driver was simply travelling through the aisle and had no reason to anticipate someone backing up out of nowhere in the parking lot. Now- in some situations that should have had time to take an evasive action (aka braking and honking) but you are DEFINATELY the most negligent of the two.

The fact that they were drinking and had no proof of insurance has nothing to do with liability. Those would be two criminal issues that the cops should take care of.

Answer 3

YIKES- when I see an excellent type of incorrect recommendations i cant help yet placed my 2 cents in with the help of actuality i hate at the same time as human beings deceive human beings at the same time as they dont pay interest to what they are speaking about. a million. I dont pay interest to the position human beings were on condition that motor vehicle parking zone injuries on the on the spot aren't any further any ones fault and everyone has to pay their own damages. Thats a daft fantasy. motor vehicle parking zone injuries get investigated like numerous diverse twist of destiny and a criminal responsibility determination is made. 2. the diverse utilizing stress isn't one hundred% at fault as someone stated. really, you would possibly want to be maximum human beings at fault if no longer one hundred% at fault. The othe utilizing stress change into only travelling contained in the direction of the aisle and had no reason to assume someone backing up out of nowhere contained in the motor vehicle parking zone. Now- in some circumstances which will have had time to take an evasive action (aka braking and honking) yet you're DEFINATELY the important negligent of both. the reality that they have got were given been eating and had no information of coverage has no longer some thing to do with criminal responsibility. those will be 2 criminal matters that the regulation enforcement officials might want to guard.

Answer 4

Parking lot deals are usually no-fault. You pay for your own damage.

The fact that they were drinking and didn't have proof of insurance is irrelevant to establishing fault.

Why didn't you stop? Weren't you looking?

Answer 5

You caused that accident by backing up in a place where people don't normally back up.

Answer 6

no its there fault they should have been keeping an eye on the road in front of them, hence they would have saw youi reversing.
and then they would have intisapated your actions better.
the only thing that is bad is they dont have insurance so you can not claim for the damage to your car

Answer 7

did you call the police? Sorry it sounds like your fault