Your boyfriends insurance company will have to pay for all 4 vehicles, since the accident was his fault. If you live in a state with required insurance, the truck driver may be cited for not having insurance, but his insurance (or lack of it) is meaningless in settling damage claims in the accident. The truck driver wouldn't use his insurance, even if he had it. He will file a claim against your boyfriend, as will the other two drivers.
2007-01-29 09:11:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lisa A 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I live in Ky. as well, and I've always heard if you hit someone in the rear, it's always YOUR fault. Not being an insurance agent I don't know how true that is. Your boyfriend does have one thing in his favor, he has insurance. I'd say the person driving the truck will be facing some kind of fine for driving with no insurance and may even have his license revoked. Just make a call to your insurance company, they will be able to answer your questions. I hope nobody was injured, and wish you luck.
2007-01-29 09:13:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by sparkie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't speak for KY, but in WA whoever is found "at fault" has to deal with all damage and medical bills. If you BF rear-ended another vehicle HE will more than likely be the one who has to deal with it, so the truck he hit not having insurance is not an issue. Although he would get a citation for driving without insurance
2007-01-29 09:14:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by topdawgco97 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have to agree with M. It doesnt matter about the truck. In all the states I've lived in, if you rear end someone, its your fault regardless of why. If there's a chain reaction from it, your insurance pays all the damages.
2007-01-29 09:14:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mrs Z. 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
If you have collision coverage (as opposed to just liability) you are covered. The liability or lack thereof of the truck driver is between them and your insurance company, not them and you.
Also, barring extraordinary circumstances (someone veering into your lane while stopping suddenly, for example, or someone who had been blocking your view swerves around a stopped car at the last second, presenting you with a dead-still target which even the 2 second rule can't save you from) rear-ending someone means you were following too closely.
2007-01-29 09:26:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
if your bf was at the rear of the accident and "cause" he's at fault no matter what.. It's his insurance that will pay does not matter the other car didn't have any. If the other truck had hit him, then his insurance would pay for his car/injuries only.
2007-01-29 09:13:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by TC_43 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you have executed each and every thing good so a techniques. the only different subject i might advise is contacting the leasing organization to advise them. Your insurer will do their terrific to circulate lower back against the at fault social gathering to recuperate their (and your) losses. Edit: a lawyer will possibly be a waste of time. If the guy did no longer have coverage, there's no longer lots risk that he has any sources.
2016-09-28 04:02:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was his fault because the person in the back is always at fault because they are supposed to give the person enough room so that if they do hit the breaks fast, you have enough time to react. Since the guy didn't have insurance, he won't get any money to repair his car unless he sues you. He probably will not however because he'll get in trouble himself for not having car insurance. Hopefully he'll just let it go!
2007-01-29 09:14:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Amanda S 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
If it was your boyfriends fault it doesn't matter if the truck owner had insurance, your boyfriends insurance company has to pay the damage.
2007-01-29 09:13:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
It depends if the people think they should sue your brother for it. If that happens, then your brother will be liable, not the truck. But some people will just use their own insurances to fix it and figure that it was the trucks fault and when they realise he doesn't have anything to sue for, they will just handle it themselves. But don't count on it, it sounds like it was your brothers fault so he is technically liable for it.
2007-01-29 09:12:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Le Nuez Vert` 3
·
0⤊
0⤋