you should answer every question to share your knowledge
2007-01-29 09:05:55
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Atleast then public view can be had! Ultimately, the aim is to find out what's going on in the minds of the millions and whether at all anything can be done to bring peace and harmony. The celebrities may not have time to read each and every answer, but they have their subordinate to brief them on what the common man thinks about their question and it matters a lot for good governance.
2007-01-30 04:19:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by ranjani raghavan 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
President Abdul Kalam, Kiran Bedi and others are citizens of India. Our country is a democratic nation with the freedom of Speech.They have a right to ask a question.
When they ask a question it is very good because
They ask intelligent questions which make the common think and become aware of situations in the world.
The answers given by famous people and others are read by many people which also helps them to understand problems and how to solve them.
Why should you feel that "public strength will be ruined"
I think that you should read all the answers and think for yourself.
In future please ask intelligent questions where the English grammar and spellings are correct.
2007-01-29 19:10:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
If the authorities that broadcasts itself the most straightforward and in actual actuality operating interior the pastimes of the conventional guy,they better "succumb" to the prevalent call for for appointing Dr.Kiran Bedi because the RTI chief.If in any respect there is anybody who benefits and has the considered necessary skills and traits to embellish that august chair,she is the single which is the most and perfect proper for that positioned up.Hitherto,we've had others who were no longer all that efficient.She is for particular to shake the administration to its roots.per chance for that reason on my own she may be discovered no longer worth of that honor.if so then,no longer only my yet each and every guy jack's faith interior the authorities would and may be seen as lost.yet then this authorities swears through its probity.enable it tutor its rectitude through unhesitatingly appointing her because the CIC.Have a tremendous Day.
2016-10-16 06:39:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its very good but i only hope they will have the time to get the views of the public seen by them whats the use that we are just wasting our time and money by getting logged on and this jus gonna go to U and ME and i jsu hope one day things start moving in the right direction rather than what,s going on now
2007-01-30 01:53:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There should not be any kind discrimination shown on account of the status of an individual. As a human being first and designated next that ought to matter.
2007-01-30 19:31:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Debate and discussion are important, so why not? Leaders should know what their constituents think. I think it's a good way for public officials and celebrities to communicate with ordinary non-famous people.
2007-01-29 08:53:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by SlowClap 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
THAT is how you get the "pulse of the nation". Celebrities and politicians have forgotten that it's the general public who put them there and it's the public that can take them down too.
2007-01-29 10:59:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is no harm if it does not affect their official status. Further the question are above the boundries of official status and give you an open atmosphere to think for humanity.
2007-01-30 00:07:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The president is a human being just like you or me. Therefore like you or me he has a right to ask questions. In fact isn't it a great opportunity for us to get a chance to interact with him?
2007-02-01 08:44:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
no,i don't think so,such public interference would only encourage people to clear their doubts and share their thoughts,also india is a democractic country,it is also once freedom of speech and expression,even if he/she holds highest offices of the country.
2007-01-29 09:25:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by ganesh n 5
·
0⤊
1⤋