Could it be that "Wars" are natural phenomenon designed to reduce the worlds population?

Answer 1

Most wars are fought in a discriminatory fashion. Races / religions / nations pitted against one another, etc.

But most aggression is justified in the same fashion. And the other party must go on the defense, as they have an interest in preserving that race, religion, or nation, to uphold the status quo.

Seeing as how we're naturally inclined to protect our particular 'sect', war does seem like a natural phenomenon. Although on a much larger scale. Anyone ever seen Meerkat Manor?

Answer 2

Well, if they are, they certainly don't do a very good job. The 20th century had the most and the biggest wars of any century, and during that 100 years the population quadrupled from abut 1.5 billion to 6 billion.

Why don't wars work? because 1) they don't kill nearly enough people. and 2) they mainly kill men.

The entire length of WW II from the beginning of the Spanish Civil War in 1937 to the end of the Chinese Commuinist Revolution in about 1950, there were about 40 or 50 million people who died. But that entire death count was replaced each year during the 1950s - in fact, much more than replaced!

So, wars probably don't serve this function.

Answer 3

"Wars" are NOT a natural phenomenon--it is a LEARNED act. There were no wars before around 4200 BCE. Of course, there were skirmishes, murders, and such, but the first recorded war was back then when Sumer fought a war with another peoples (I forget who).

One thing is certain, we're over populating a world (6.5 BILLION) where only 2 billion can comfortably live and not deplete natural resources. The good news is, humans will never destroy the Earth. The better news is, they'll wipe themselves out long before the Earth ceases to exist.

Answer 4

If war were a natural phenomenon designed to reduce population, then one would expect it to work, right? Instead, the human population has continued to increase exponentially, despite frequent war. This would lead me to believe that it is not a natural phenomenon to reduce population.

Very interesting idea, though.

Answer 5

Yeah, right, and maybe genocidal maniacs like Hitler and Pol Pot were the true benefactors of the human race, helping to protect us from exhausting our natural resources. Think of it! You wipe out most of the people. Bang, you’ve just eliminated hunger, unemployment and poverty. That’s fine, as long as you’re not one of those who are wiped out.

29 JAN 07, 1817 hrs, GMT.

Answer 6

that makes sense, because every generation has seen a war.
i gues we need war to keep from over populating the world.

Answer 7

features that are genetically surpassed down that supply advantages to a species will enable that species to stay to tell the tale greater valuable. A mutation in the approach (you're able to call it God's fingerprint in case you like, yet scientists could call it a mutation) can help or harm a species. you may finally end up with 6 hands on a hand, downs syndrome, or the flexibility to technique lactic acid greater valuable. If that's something like the latter, and you mate with somebody else with that trait, your offspring will maximum possibly have the trait as nicely. If this supplies you greater effective staying power, then whilst issues bypass quite incorrect, and you're able to desire to run on your lives to stay to tell the tale, your offspring have a greater valuable threat. The giraffe isn't morphed from a horse or despite in one technology. If there's a god and (s)he needed a giraffe, why make the approach take see you later?

Answer 8

That's one theory.

I still think that they are the result of peoples sheep mentality.

Answer 9

I often wondered about that myself...