Why?
Personally I have to go with amoral. It recognizes that I am unfettered by their ad hoc systems of moral conformity.
2007-01-29 03:43:56 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Mr. Ed.
I'm having fun.
2007-01-29 03:49:48 · update #1
Frankly my dear....
2007-01-29 03:47:29 · answer #1 · answered by fourmorebeers 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
From wikipedia: Amorality is the quality of having no concept of right or wrong. 'Amorality' or 'amoralism' may also refer to a lack of belief in the absolute existence of any moral laws. A person who is immoral knows the difference between right and wrong. I would rather know the difference. If I'm being immoral at least I am intelligent to know the problem that I can correct. We would lack as human beings if we were amoral. We would devolve rather than evolve. I can honestly say, I do not care what a christian or anyone else for that matter thinks of me. What I think of myself is most important.
2007-01-29 11:56:41 · answer #2 · answered by Maureen B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What Christian, or anyone for that matter, has the right to judge? Isn't that why we have such a rift in society today..because we're all too busy judging one another? Who cares what people think? Noone said their way of life is 100% correct either. There is no true answer to anything...only perspective. And when people stop being so judgemental maybe they'll see that.
2007-01-29 11:57:17 · answer #3 · answered by shaulbrook72 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would rather be perceived as amoral, but I'm not entirely sure that Christians can objectively view one as such. Whether one is acting in accordance with a moral code can only be measured as against a moral code: their perception that one was amoral would be based upon their perception that one was immoral as measured against Christianity. The results, therefore, would not be to determine that one had no moral code, but rather that one had no moral code as measured against their own code; thereby rendering any determination of the behavior in question to be "immoral" as opposed to "Christian".
I'm not entirely sure, but I think the Heisenberg uncertainty principle applies to a Christian measuring behavior by a non-Christian for morality.
2007-01-29 11:51:52 · answer #4 · answered by Blackacre 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Personally, I don't care how they regard me. I do not consider myself to be inherently immoral or amoral. I have a code of ethics that I live by but that code is independent of any religious notion of morality.
2007-01-29 11:50:23 · answer #5 · answered by Murazor 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the christian really, they dont agree with each other and consider each other amoral so how they can judge anyone else - no idea mate.
2007-01-29 11:49:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
When I take into account the fact that I consider them and their belief system to be amoral...I couldn't care less what they think of me.
2007-01-29 11:48:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Amoral.
2007-01-29 11:47:40 · answer #8 · answered by Cold Fart 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Depending on the branch of Christianity, and the individual, I might take "immoral" as a complement. Their are a number of "Christians" on Y!A, who take their salvation as forgivenesss against all wrongs, regardless of their actions. They hurl insults liberally, and their hypocracy is frequently rich in irony.
2007-01-29 11:54:41 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally I'd like very much not be judged by anyone, thanks.
I don't care what Christians consider me, because I consider myself a kind and loving person - PERIOD.
2007-01-29 11:49:16 · answer #10 · answered by Aunt Henny Penny 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Judge Not Lest Ye Be Judged!"
If they were really Christian, they would consider me neither.
I guess, for the hell of it, I would choose immoral becasue if they are truly that judegemental, I probably don't share there "morals", so I would where their label of immorality with pride.
2007-01-29 11:54:17 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋