IRAQ - will you sign on to my non-binding resolution?

Question

My non-binding resaolution says that the actions of the Senate are not in the national interest - that dithering over some resolution opposing the president's action is not only a waste of time, but only serves to demoralize our troops and embolden an enemy whose only possible strategy for victory is for the Americans to lose their will to fight.

What are your thoughts?

Answer 1

I would gladly sign this. We do need to get this on paper and delivered to the Senate.

Answer 2

It wasn't nukes a lot because it become chemical and organic and organic guns. Saddam Hussein used those guns on the Kurds in northern Iraq. Your boyfriend Obama used our military without congressional approval. the in user-friendly words time the president does no longer want congressional approval is at the same time as there's a real, impending attack on u.s.. keep dreaming that Iran isn't pursuing nuclear guns. they have stated that they are making use of their nuclear learn for non violent applications then turned around and stated they want to take Israel off of the map. the Iranians also did not enable UN inspectors on their internet sites. in the adventure that they haven't any further some thing to conceal then they could enable those inspectors in. Harry Reid (Communist - Nevada) is protecting up debate and vote on various abode charges that handle the economy and jobs. Blaming Republicans for Democrats no longer doing their jobs is definitely a Liberal trait. Obama is a loser and in user-friendly words losers nonetheless help him. He and his administration are extra risky than terrorists. If a Republican president were doing what Obama is doing you Libs might want to be screaming for his head. finally, get a female friend! Your mind is fuzzy and consider too a lot time on your hands.

Answer 3

I'll sign! The congress forgets its place. They need to stop trying to usurp the president's constitutional duties as commander in chief and get to legislating the domestic issues such as border security, social security, etc. The president was duly elected and thereby given the rights to determine foreign policy as the head of state and commander-in-chief.

If they feel a real need to intervene, then they should be cutting funding in a binding resolution. Otherwise, they need to stop grandstanding and get back to work.

Answer 4

I'll sign! I'll also sign a binding resolution to order a trial of the Democratic Congress whose 'anti-war' actions amount to little more than treason!

Answer 5

Start it, post it and consider it signed by me. Would love to see the looks on the faces of the Liberal Socialist in the Legislative Branch when it was delivered. A few RINO's I would like to see get the same treatment, Starting with Hagel.

Answer 6

Agreed

Answer 7

Spending time on a NON Binding resolutiuon is a waste of time. Congress has overstepped it's boundries into the Judicial and now wants to overstep into the Executive branch. They are quickly becoming the House of Lords.........

Answer 8

I hereby announce my support for that resolution.

I also will introduce articles of impeachment for the below - mentioned traitors in the senate and house who want to lose the war on islamofascism.

Harry Reid
Nancy Pelosi
Jack Murtha
John Kerry
Hussein Obama
Edward Kennedy
John Edwards
And many many more.

Answer 9

You just stated my thought. Why can't the senate work on something that helps the citizens instead of wasting time on worthless resolutions. Issues they may want to start with include immigration, immigration, immigration, health care,and immigration.

Answer 10

Absolutely!