What do you think and why?
2007-01-28 20:55:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Pulling out now would be disasterous, Best case scnerio invoke the draft.over run the countries of Iraq and Iran with troops close the borders to neighboring countries If they attempt to enter shoot on sigjht. Iran might get ballsy and stick their nose in but if they try to use nukes that will probably be their last mistake. There won't be enough of the left of their bodies or souls for Allah to recognize! Reality we should slowly withdraw and re-enforce the troop rotation with trainers train the Iraqi's to stand on their own two feet and get out. let them have a civil war.
2007-01-28 21:16:51 · answer #1 · answered by mikef1234 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Britain and United states of America can pull out of Iraq if they can summon the courage and do the right thing. All they need to do is either one of the two. To pull out of Iraq within the next 9 months to one year time, they need to organise fresh elections in Iraq. The elections should be properly monitored and all warring factions should participate. This would lead to a government represented by all. The success of this strategy depends largely on the transparency of the electioneering process.
Secondly, a government of national unity can be formed. But this may not be as successful as the former. The Iraqis would hardly trust Americans and their allies to nominate those who would lead them without bias.
2007-01-29 10:28:40 · answer #2 · answered by MAFOKOCHIZHI 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
just to get this right lets call it the USA/Britain's Vietnam... don't forget as always Britain followed the USA.... but at least we can say its our first VIETNAM..
but i don't think we will ever pull out completely.. we will be they for a long time yet..
2007-01-31 12:30:56 · answer #3 · answered by bellyman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can and should pull out.
We should do anything we can to support the Iraquis externally.
We are already treating it as the coalition's Vietnam.
The question is, 'Should 'we' be there doing what 'we' are doing?'
What has happened since Bush and Blair first considered their illegal enterprise is a separate wright/wrong issue, despite their pathetic protestations.
2007-01-29 05:21:03 · answer #4 · answered by steveb9458 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I understand that we are in the process of reducing our commitment.
We sent 45000 troops to assist with the invasion and I think we are now down to about 7000. I also understand that this number is to be reduced as the USA increases it's troops by another 20000 or so.
To answer your question I do not believe that Britain will allow herself to be bogged down indefinitely in this mess
2007-01-29 05:10:00 · answer #5 · answered by George 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
its not 'Britain's Vietnam' cause it was America that decided 2 invade Iraq for its oil we just got forced to go with them cause they need someone to hold their hand!
2007-01-29 14:50:07 · answer #6 · answered by oddball 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course we can!!! The question is what will happen afterwards. The Shia and Sunni will continue to kill each other.
2007-01-29 05:10:27 · answer #7 · answered by da_bears46 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no we havent brought freedom and democracy to all the oil yet all they have to do is give the west back the oil and they can do what they like. america sold them the wmd so they had to get them back.
2007-01-29 05:44:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋