Do Nancy Pelosi and Osama bin Laden have the same goal?

Question

...i.e. remove an advocate of a strong national defense from the Presidency?

This was not an original idea of mine: a headline in the San Fransisco Chronical, 21 January 2007, said "Pelosi's crew and Osama bin Laden share common goal."
I don't know why you liberals can't fact the facts - both want Bush out of office. Or is it that you yourself want the same thing - you just don't have the fortitude to admit that, for this one issue, you are on the same side as the #1 terrorist?

Answer 1

No, Osama merely wants to kill us.
Pelosi wants to make us cowardly and ineffective in the world, which will only make Osama & his friends come after us harder.

Answer 2

Bush has the monopoly on aiding and abetting and aligning with Al Qaeda terrorists. His oil company, Arbusto, is partners with Osama Bin Laden's family. As an act of friendship, Bush gave Osama's brother, Salem, the Houston Gulf Airport in Texas. Halliburton had the contracts to build the Al Qaeda training camps. Gates, our new Secretary of Defense, was the man assigned way back when to train the original Al Qaeda forces. And, Bush is outspokenly aligned with the Christian Evangelicals, 40 million strong, whose leadership last fall reported in "Faith and Nation" that they advocate the violent overthrow of the U.S. government if their radical religious agenda is not made into legislation. Siding with terrorists runs in the Bush family. Prescott Bush, President Bush's grandfather, provided Hitler with at least a third of all the raw materials and ores that were needed for the Nazi war machine and refused to stop until President Roosevelt and Congress forced him to stop with the Trading With the Enemy Act.

Answer 3

Partisan Politics is generic without bounds. The Republicans have congratulated Obama and his administration with tremendous regularity, the Democrats have not in any respect been waiting to provide themselves to congratulating a Republican for some thing. even even as Reagan presented down the wall in Russia, the Democrats skipped over it as saying it wasn't Reagan, it replaced into Gorbachev, even as Bush 40-one laid waste to Saddam's 4th remarkable militia contained interior the international in 4 days, the democrats reported they have been in truth conscripts, it is always some thing with the Democrats, although the Republicans grant credit the position credit is due.

Answer 4

If that is true then, according to the latest polls, so do about 70% of the American public. (Bush approval rating is 30%, the lowest ever for a sitting president).

Answer 5

They feel that the President was delinquint in the defense of our country on 911. He and the sec of defense failed miserbly.
The Sec of Defense should have been fired on 9/11 at 10:30 am.

Answer 6

No. Nancy Pelosi wants us alive and dependent upon the government - with her as president - Bin Laden wants us dead.

Answer 7

I don't think any American in his/her right mind is in line w/ Osama (to include Muslim Americans). I'm in support of a strong nation, just not a weak idiot ( I'm speaking of Mr. Good ol' boy by the way)

Answer 8

Pelosi, champion of union workers everywhere, uses non union migrant workers in her vineyards...Bin Laden only wants Muslim supremecy in the world with all non muslims dead...BIG difference...

Answer 9

No, Ms. Pelosi wants to replace a babbling freak with someone who'll be responsible and sensible. You got a problem with that, eh bucko? Wanna make something of it? Come see me, you copy that?

Answer 10

Why is it that when someone disagrees with Bush's policy in Iraq, they become the enemy of the country? What ever happened to freedome of speech, freedome of expression, freedom to disagree? Why do right wing republicans think that everyone has to agree with the failed policies of Bush to be considered patriotic?
Why do republicans think that if you disagree with a failed presidency, you become a supporter of our enemy?

Answer 11

Your saying they have this goal does not make it so. I prefer to think that they have the goal to serve this country in the best way they can. As for your "strong national defense," I again disagree. Our national defense is weakened by putting U.S. troops in harm's way for political reasons.