Both represent sales of mutual funds in 2 kids respective UGMAs.
I hope I am mis-interpreting form 8814. It says can be used for "capital gain distributions", but I assume this does not include long term capital gains from a sale: correct?
Form 8615 allows cap.gains to be combined across kids so they can be taxed at a higher rate, but cap.losses are truncated to zero in line 3 so can't be used to balance other kids gains. Right?
Usually, in spite of the complexity, the IRA makes sense when you think about it. Can it be that they want to tax the sum of the capital gains of the kids at the higher rate, but not allow a balance with capital loss of the kids, even if they are allowed to balance out on individual tax forms? This seems unjust.
2007-01-28
11:41:03
·
2 answers
·
asked by
helpme
2
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ United States