Could be. Maybe Cain and Abel really came from the people of Nod, and were just adopted by Adam and Steve.
Adam and Eve have nothing to do with the sexuality of others, just as a homosexual's sexuality has nothing to do with your own (unless you're secretly lusting after him/her). There were homosexual relationships in the Bible:
* Ruth clave onto her mother-in-law, Naomi (as a man cleaves unto his wife) (Ruth 1:14)
* The soul of Jonathan was knit with the soul of David, and they made a covenant between them, lived together, and kissed each other. (1 Samuel 18:1-4, 20:41). The original Hebrew indicates that David got an erection ("became great") while kissing Jonathan, but Christian translators changed it to say he cried more, and one version leaves out the kissing entirely and says that they just shook hands. David later admits that Jonathan's love for him was better than a woman's. (2 Samuel 1:26)
2007-01-28 12:07:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by gelfling 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i might have not something against legalizing a gay union, call it a civil union not a marriage. they might nonetheless get the comparable criminal rights as a married couple. people who do not have confidence interior the bible bypass to city hall, is going with the entire adam and eve ingredient, you recognize. As for it producing a decision for our economy - do not think of so. even if it would be stable for small agencies, resorts, reception halls, something that is going with achieving a marriage/union. so some distance as producing extra sales for the government by way of taxes, back no, they might actual unfastened funds, there may well be extra write offs hence, much less sales. and do not forget approximately concerning the insurance firms that would unfastened bunches of funds insuring a "kin" vs persons, enormous loss there. gay "Marriage" is going against our common beleif equipment. Which we are taught at an exceedingly early age. the 1st ingredient you learn in sunday college is that god created adam and then he created eve for adam. it is largely what i think of human beings have against it. call it a union and that i don't think of you have got the combat, nor the protests, nor outrage from the religious sector. As for prostitution, you should use the comparable philosophy using fact the philipines, make valuable they have verify united statesand enjoying cards to coach that they are STD/AIDS unfastened. you're unlikely to offer up prostitution or human beings smoking pot (even if if human beings had their way, cigarettes could be outlawed), you're able to be able to besides legalize it and tax it. playing is transforming into criminal in maximum places, to an quantity. you have got problems with the mob and individuals that run the black marketplace to legalize factors of this, they make way too plenty off it. it is my opinion besides. You valuable do positioned questions that make us think of on right here. stable for you.
2016-12-13 03:11:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think that the bible is just one form of the word of our creator for people who learn in that way. I believe that the Lord wants us to be kind to each other,love each other and forgive each other. Any kind of marriage, weither it is a man and woman or a man and a man, should be based on love, commitment and trust. God doesnt want us to have sex in the streets with tons of people weither we are gay or straight. I have many gay friends who i want to see happy and together. These people want what we all want; love, marriage, children, insurance, benifits, and to know that if their spouse dies the children in the home wont be ripped out by parents or others in the community who dont agree with their love. I have seen so many "man woman" marriages with insest, divorce, adultry, alcohalism and so on. I have seen many many "man woman" marriages that are great and built on love, trust and commitment. I say that just because we dont understand their love, doesnt mean it is wrong. God is love. God is forgiveness. God is understanding. I know that the bible is just one way for the Lord to speak to people. There are many other ways out there if we just look.
2007-01-28 12:18:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
What I think is, the idea of Adam and Steve shows your ignorance, and that same-sex marriages, and other things like abortion are bringing us closer to the wrath of God.
2007-01-28 11:39:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by lost and found 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. It wasn't translated wrong and actually has nothing to do with reality. There was no Adam and Eve as well there was no Adam and Steve, you silly.
2007-01-28 11:30:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by A 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Highly doubtful. I am sure that there are a few that believe this to be alright, but I don't and from what is written, neither does the FATHER. Have a great evening.
Eds
2007-01-28 13:16:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Eds 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No personally i don't thinkt he Bible was translated wrong. I think you are just trying to be a smart A**. How could Adam and Steve reproduce. .Don't be so retarded. .grow up.
2007-01-28 11:30:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
What makes you think that Adam and Eve would have been married?
2007-01-28 11:28:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by The Truth 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Brilliant question - All those outraged fools crawling out of the woodwork.
Well done, keep up the good work.
2007-01-28 21:48:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first people would not have been able to reproduce. So it was really Adam and Eve.
2007-01-28 11:30:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by SeeTheLight 7
·
2⤊
1⤋