2007-01-28 09:48:06 · 17 answers · asked by don c 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I believe that she had belly button because He knew what she was going to have to do. But since she was not born out of a woman, she did not need one. So it might be also the other way around, so that she did not have it but all her children had it...because they were going to be born natural way.
I do not know if God made other people that were not mentioned in the Bible. That could have been a sign to know from the bellybutton if they were born out of women or if God made them. It is a mistake that the partial record is false.
2007-01-28 10:08:48 · answer #1 · answered by SeeTheLight 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Did Adam and Eve have bellybuttons?
For those who believe the Bible to be historically accurate, this is not a trivial question. If Adam and Eve did not have navels, then they were not perfect human beings. On the other hand, if they had navels, then the navels would imply a birth they never experienced.
Bruce Felton and Mark Fowler are the authors of The Best, Worst, and Most Unusual (Galahad Books, 1994). In this entertaining reference work, they devote several paragraphs (pp. 146-147) to what they call "the wont theological dispute." They take this to be the acrimonious debate, which has been going on ever since the book of Genesis was written, over whether the first human pair had what Sir Thomas Browne, in 1646, called "that tortuosity or complicated nodosity we usually call the Navell."
Browns opinion was that Adam and Eve, because they had no parents, must have had perfectly smooth abdomens. In 1752, according to Felton and Fowler, the definitive treatise on the topic was published in Germany. It was tided Untersuchung der Frage: Ob unsere ersten Uraltern, Adam und Eve, einen Nabel gehabt (Examination on the Question: Whether Our First Ancestors, Adam and Eve, Possessed a Navel). After discussing all sides of this difficult question, the author, Dr. Christian Tobias Ephraim Reinhard, finally concluded that the famous pair were navelless.
2007-01-28 10:43:06 · answer #2 · answered by Freedom 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"yet by utilising making them so heavily appropriate, he ensured that incest would desire to be the only thank you to procreate." Incest wasn't a sin until the Mosaic regulation. in the past then, there probable weren't adequate risky mutations interior the human genetic pool for there to be an significant threat of deformities. "Why commence off procreation in this way, while he would have rather created Eve from airborne dirt and dirt as he did Adam?" He would have, i assume, yet He did no longer. The bible would not provide a definitive rationalization why, yet in line with danger it became a romantic gesture on God's area. Eve purely wasn't yet another lump of airborne dirt and dirt, yet had come from area of Adam, in all likelihood to create a extra shelter and lasting bond between the two.
2016-11-01 13:02:16 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. It's a shame too because a flat belly is a beautiful thing. I can't imagine that it would be all that attractive without the dimple in the middle.
If Adam and Eve were technically of the same matter, does that mean that when they had sex it was more like masturbation?
2007-01-28 09:51:53 · answer #4 · answered by robtheman 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yep.
Check out the word "rib" in the Hebrew. It also means curve. DNA is a double spiral helix. So if it was all about DNA, Eve was ALSO created via a homo whatever close relative. Two complimentary 'errors' in one lifetime! Who'd a thunk?
2007-01-28 10:00:13 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm thinking neither Eve nor Adam would have had a belly button as neither were conceived in a womb. If that is what you believe happened.
2007-01-28 09:51:31 · answer #6 · answered by fluid_reality78 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The DNA comment was on the right track. What is the only difference between male and female genes? Men have a "Y" where women have an "X." The Y is literally the X with a little piece (a curve, if you will) broken off.
2007-01-28 09:59:20 · answer #7 · answered by aparadoxsimple 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Nope.
Check out the word "rib" in the Hebrew.
It also means curve.
DNA is a double spiral helix.
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Wayne Murray
2007-01-28 09:50:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Glad these important theological questions are being posted.
Who cares if she had a belly button or not.
2007-01-28 09:52:58 · answer #9 · answered by fifimsp1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You sexist person! You neglect to ask if Adam had one either!
She did and she had it pierced in Gomorrah. It was very hot.
Adam got a "I'm #1" tattoo.
2007-01-28 09:52:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋