in ours bodies lie something called the bacteria flagellum. the bacteria flagellum is in bacteria and is like a tail that has a motor like function, the problem is that in order for evolution to be true to explain creation it is impossible for these parts to have evolved. The reason is because it is like a motor and everyone knows that you need many working parts all at once and properly in place to work. Therefore it would be impossible to have evolved which would have required a gradual gain and placement of parts in which by that time life would not have been able to be sustained. Creation is explainable through faith and through the word of God but also through the little bacteria flagellum. To have an well assembled motorlike part in this bacteria shows undefensable evidence for an intelligent designer who is God.
There are no solid facts in which science can prove this. I pray you will embrace the creator, I appeal, please come to the savior that is Christ Jesus and ask him
2007-01-28 08:08:26 · 23 answers · asked by disciple 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There are so many ways to dispute evolution, and the evolutionists will still find a way to stand up for it. The only reason they stick by it is because they can't stand to admit the fact that there is Someone that will answer to at the end of days. They can't fathom that Someone created them. I think they're flailing in the water and trying to grab a life preserver, but the problem is that they keep grabbing bits of rope that lead to nothing. Evolutionists have their own religion whether they want to admit it or not. They keep waiting for something to be found that will prove evolution. Mr. Darwin died waiting for proof and so will they, unless they find their way. Just be confident in the fact that we have already found God and we don't have to wait for anything. The more discoveries they make, the more everything points to God.
2007-01-28 08:37:47 · answer #1 · answered by Phoebe 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
NH Baritone's answer is absolutely correct. There are solid facts that prove that each component of the bacterial flagellum has its own function. The Dover Trial provided enough evidence to prove that the bacterial flagellum is not irreducibly complex.
Creation is only explainable through faith. Nothing else supports it.
God is not an intelligent designer. He is a law maker. Evolution is the only way He could have created life, because the evidence supports it.
2007-01-28 08:19:50 · answer #2 · answered by Chris W 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your 'irreducable complexity' is an old argument, and not a good one. I am not going into detail on this, but I will get you started. Structures such as this most often start out as something else which becomes changed by evolution so that it may serve a specialized function. This is much like the small hairs in our inner ear. So too, the flagellum would not have originally used this structure for movement, but after a few hundred million years the appendage would have changed towards this because of the usefulness it provided.
Go to school.
2007-01-28 08:17:32 · answer #3 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It took me 20 seconds online to find the response of scientists to this very old argument. This was refuted a long time ago and does NOT have the support of science. Therefore it IS just opinion.
I am not an evolutionist as I don't think such a term means anything - it's like calling someone an Einsteinist or a Newtonist. I will listen to the science before I listen to someone with an anti-science agenda.
2007-01-28 11:09:24 · answer #4 · answered by The Truth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This claim was presented by Michael Behe in "Darwin's Black Box years ago. It has been debunked numerous times. The fallacy of the argument lies in the the pre-emptive assumption that it's "impossible" for a flagella to have formed through natural processes. The fact that simpler transportation methods exist in nature, can be created in laboratories, and can be reasonably postulated destroy the concept of impossibility. This does not prove HOW the flagella evolved, but it does prove that divine intervention was not necessary for to happen.
2007-01-28 08:26:30 · answer #5 · answered by marbledog 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This IS AN OPINION, based on your faith and religious beliefs. IT IS POSSIBLE for life to evolve, given enough time and there was enough time on this planet, about 4 billion years. Natural selection can do it's work, go look it up and you will understand.
Since evolution is FACT, doesn't that show a more powerful god in the sacred texts. But instead, most see that humans were created seperately, like creation.
2007-01-28 08:15:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Just b/c you cannot prove it wrong, does not mean you can prove it right.
Let's imagine that we have a conversation one day and I say to you, "I believe in Leprechauns. You cannot prove that Leprechauns do not exist, therefore they exist." You actually have heard of Leprechauns. There are lots of books, movies and fairy tales dealing with Leprechauns. People talk about Leprechauns all the time. Leprechauns even have a popular brand of breakfast cereal. But that does not mean that Leprechauns exist. There is no physical evidence for the existence of Leprechauns. Not a single bit. Therefore, it is obvious to any normal person that Leprechauns are imaginary. There is no difference between "god" and Leprechauns.
2007-01-28 08:16:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm not an evolutionist. If Zero says the irreducible complexity of the bacteria flagellum is now disproved, I challenge him to name his source. While he's at it, let him deal with Roger Penrose's calculations of the odds of the universe we have coming about by chance (1 in 100,000,000,000 to the 123rd power--pigs could have better odds of flying!). Then he can disprove the fine-tuning of the macrouniverse, the Cambrian Explosion, the complexity of DNA programming...ad infinitum...
Hang in there. Evolutionists are as they are because if they admitted that they were created beings, then they would have to be accountable to their Creator, and that's the last thing they want.
2007-01-28 08:26:09 · answer #8 · answered by perelandra 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
it's certainlly possible for the parts to evolved the parts of the flagellum are actually also used for something else, you just make some changes and BAM, you have a flagellum
2007-01-28 08:14:52 · answer #9 · answered by Nick F 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
i agree with everyone above me except you. I am an atheist, I can tell you right now that the reason the flaggela work is not because god just woke up one day and said, hmm, i think ill make bacteria tails today. get a brain.
2007-01-28 08:16:13 · answer #10 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋