Isn't Evolution better science than creationism?

Question

Since evolution is a FACT, proven by science. Science shows us that given the 4 BILLION years of time that evolution through natural selection worked, you get the beautiful diversity of the biological world. You see it everywhere, today. How all life on this planet is connected, we really are one planet is awesome!

If you look up the word "spiritual" is simple means a feeling of connectiveness and oneness with the universe. Evolution shows that all life on our planet is made of the same elements, we are all connected. That is so much more humbling than anything creationism can touch.

Why would you want to be seperately created from all other life, instead of connected to all life? If you believe in god, doesn't that show you a more powerful view of god. Instead, most say that "My god is small, and he created us seperately."

What a depressing thought. If more people would embrace the beauty of evolution, we would take better care of our planet and each other.

life is only complex to those who don't understand what life really is.

THAT IS NOT WHAT HITLER THOUGHT. HE USED SOMETHING CALLED POLITICAL IDEOLOGY AND HE WAS SICK AND TWISTED.

Several responses on this question show the infection, brought on my the mind virus of religion.

Evolution is everywhere, just look outside your window!

...and the bible is NOT proof.

Answer 1

Um.... of course?

Answer 2

besides the shown fact that, creationism is a non secular stance. , yet clever layout isn't. Creationism is a term defined by utilising particular non secular communities that sell the thought that God created the two the earth or the universe in 6 24-hour days. The Bible, besides the shown fact that, makes use of the observe "day" to defined fixed or unspecified time sessions of various lengths. Genesis a million:5, Genesis 2:4, 2 Peter 3:8 So your Google seek for technology papers on creationism will probable no longer yield consequences. A canvass of the historical past of medical advances demonstrate that an massive form of people who contemporary medical information in papers are initially maligned and ridiculed by utilising scientists who prefer to maintain the prestige quo besides the shown fact that, college knowledgeable scientists with ranges in correct subjects have submitted papers on the concern of the validity of advent, it incredibly is, the thought that the universe reflects information of clever layout. you will no longer discover a lot of them interior the main significant technology journals, with the aid of fact many times there's a coverage against accepting papers that contemporary such an thought in a favorable way, inspite of the meticulous use of the medical approach interior the study. So on an identical time as creationism is a non secular stance, evolution comes from a non medical international view. you would be able to call it materialism, or naturalism, however the nice and comfortable button is that's initially agreed upon between authoritative technology circles to no longer stick to the technology while it leads to clever layout. that's authentic that maximum great scientists in historical past believed that the earth became created. it is likewise authentic that the well-known scientist accepts that the universe had a commencing up. it is likewise authentic that yet another rationalization for the universe is clever incredibly than a mindless stress. there's no longer something unreasonable approximately those information, for this reason, a scientist could have faith that the universe became created by utilising an clever being exterior of time and area, without denying technology. actual technology isn't something better than an independent based inquiry. The scientist could stick to the inquiry, and the coolest judgment. If somebody insisted (as many medical study government do) which you will stick to the medical approach, the information and the coolest judgment except it leads to God, then that's no longer technology.

Answer 3

Creationism is not science, it is pure religious propaganda

The study of Evolution is pure science. It is not yet 100% proven, that is why it is still referred to as the theory of Evolution.

Scientists are people who deal in facts, empirical evidence, that is why even though the scientific community is convinced that evolution is real. As in any scientific study until all data has been thoroughly investigated and tested, scientists being open minded will never try to pass it of as truth (unlike religion there is no room for faith let alone blind faith).
But day by day as new data comes and supports the theory, we are becoming more and more convinced that evolution is right.

Creationism is not even presented as a theory. With no evidence and no data, it is based solely on a religious tome of dubious heritage. Creationism is being presented as 100% fact and called by those who perpetuate this lie an undeniable and unchallengeable fact.
This is not just wrong, it sets a dangerous precedent. If the creationists can get away with teaching this nonsense in schools, can you imagine what they will try next.

Answer 4

When was evolution demonstrated as fact?? I have yet to read that in any scientific journal. Evolution is based on historical scientific thought rather than observational scientific methods. By nature, evolution cannot be 100% accurate because most of its "evidence" is lost or cannot be observed or repeated. Seriously, how can you emphatically claim that natural selection works over 4 billion years when you cannot demonstrate any repeat experiments that prove random floating matter come together to form matter that functions on a highly intelligent sophisticated process. Show me in a lab just one example and I'll believe your claim about the THEORY of evolution. By the way, creationism is a belief system, not a scientific method so you are in error to call it science.

Answer 5

where is the real solid proof?
the fossils we base our evidence on are dated with carbon dating which is fairly questionable in itself
ok so lets say a mouse decides there is better food on the other side of this hill and it has to fly to get there, in order to survive, because all of the good food on this side of the hill is all out, it has to get over there some how, so it trys and ends up dying because it couldn't make its wings fast enough. then its offspring does the same thign and there is a mutation that forms and stubs for wings appear, it still dies off because he cant move anywhere with stubs of little wings. therefore the whole species would eventually die off.
Ok another example- giraffes used to be animales with shorter necks, and more of a deer kind of animal. the way it gets its long neck is for reaching to the tops of trees for food that will make him survive better. but there is also good food that is at the bottom of the trees that he could easily get, but he'd rather die stretching his neck out for the food at the top of the trees that he wants to get to to survive better. does this really make any sense?
what you may consider scientific fact is merely scientists trying to explain the development of animals.
creationism isn't a spritiual concept. just because one religion may involve a higher power doesn't mean that creationism is a religion. there are many non religious people that believe in creationsism.
many people assume that creationists have to do with religion which is wrong.

Answer 6

While evolution hasn't been elevated to the level of "Law" (or fact), it's as close as one can get (some have offered that it should be given the title, in fact).
Creationism has little to do with science- it's just religion tarted up. They started with their conclusion and worked backwards; definately not scientific.
I appreciate your thoughts of a more harmonious existance.

Answer 7

Of course, Evolution is better science than Creationism. It actually explains things. It has actually helped us predict things like new viral forms.

P.S. Try your best to ignore some of the more ill-informed answers. I have this feeling that Yahoo! Answers is trolled by fundies.

Answer 8

i would have to say, it is more humbling to me to believe "i was created individually (not seperatly) by an almighty god who holds together every atom of the universe and still has time to care for me individually" than "i evolved on my own." also, if we did evolve, and there was a cosmic bang from DNA on some meteor, where did the meteor come from? according to evolution, you will have to keep things evolving for an eternity past, and eventually you will arive at spontaneous generation of life, a scientific impossibility, where as christians, (not all creationists) believe that a God who lives outside of time and physical possibility created the world in (i personally believe) seven days by the word of his mouth. THAT is what i call humbling, an all powerful God, that has been around for eternity past, finds time to care about me, and sent his only son to die for me. how is that less humbling than "we evolved on our own from sludge"?

Answer 9

You "Evolution" people think we evolved from monkeys. This is not true.

We actually evolved from Beatles. The Monkees were just a rip off for a television program.

Answer 10

Since creationism is no where near science and evolution is a SCIENTIFIC theory, I would say yes.

Answer 11

Where have you been buddy? GIve me some papers that actually state evoulution as fact/true science. There is no evidence to support YOUR OPINION, but for Creationism we have our faith and the Word of God. This is THE TRUTH, regardless of what you're thinking right now as you're reading my answer I know I am right and when God comes to take all the Christians I can only hope that you were saved by then. I will pray for you that you find God and get saved before it is too late. God Bless you, take care.