2007-01-28 08:03:52 · 13 answers · asked by maivas229 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
There is always a nominal winner.
In the case of Iraq, the mass killings will carry on the same until the US/UK get out, then there will be a hell of a civil war which the Shias will win. They will install an Islamic republic with Shariah laws and ruthless suppression and torture on Sadam lines.
But we shall of course hail it as a big success by us, well worth the sacrifice in lives and wealth and we shall bite our time until the next opportunity arises to intervene somewhere.
2007-01-28 08:23:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
When the Iraqi war ends, Bush will lose a lot more.
Bush started the war for the oil.
Now the Iraqi said that the American are not going to get the oil.
Even though we gave them money to build hospital.
The Iraqi is going to be the real winner because they will shove the Muslim culture here in the United States. As a result, more terrorist attack. Remember the Vietnam war, in the end we have tons of Veitnamese here in the United States.
2007-01-28 08:10:43 · answer #2 · answered by SweetBrunette 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. Whoever manages to make off with the Anunnaki technology buried there and figures out how to back-engineer it will be the real winner. Currently, the US has the inside track, but unless 'our' clandestine leadership decides to share with the German, French, and Russian programs, it could lead to an entirely new and different 'cold war'. The Columbia shootdown might well represent the opening salvo in such a war.
2007-01-28 08:16:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your view on the international is gloomy and pathetic. The Iraq conflict became nicely intentioned yet poorly carried out. US bombing did no longer reason the "death of 500,000 toddlers and doggies," that's a bull **** statistic made up by utilising you or one among your socialist web content. the U. S. bombing submit-Gulf conflict became generally defense force and aerial installations. So except the Iraqis geared up faculties and nurseries under flak cannons and radar stations (they did no longer), your "statistic" is faulty. As for being prosecuted, he would be prosecuted after Clinton gets prosecuted for Bosnia or Kosovo or Somalia or Sudan, etc. no longer occurring. And the hot President, that one did no longer vote for the Iraq conflict with the aid of fact he became a STATE SENATOR on the time. If he became in DC he could have been a competent 'ol boy and obeyed his Democratic Senate management. All in all, examine a e book or a nonbiased source. Then fake you comprehend what you're conversing approximately.
2016-11-01 12:51:43 · answer #4 · answered by bason 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Iraqi War is a prelude to the Iranian War!
Stay tuned it should only be a couple more months!
2007-01-28 08:09:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
it is interesting to listen to the debate going on at the British House of Commons on C-Span. They seem to have more level heads that the Bushies. It's alarming that the British are more ready to study the Iraq Study Group's suggestions than the notoriously stubborn and constant mistake-making Bush. It's strange that over in Britain and here, the hook-nosed rascals tend to trumpet only Israeli-type of propaganda and politics, rather than focus on world peace suggestions. The World of good citizens must be more concerned that Israel not take into the path of Armaggedon, but see that constructive and more realistic negotiations, not led by biased Pro-Israeli or pro-Iran leaders and their ***-kissing research organizations. Remember how Zionist Abramoff had tried to buy the souls of our own Senators to uphold Zionists' dirty politics, lies, and dirty ideologies to stir up chaos and .danger in the world.
2007-01-28 08:28:21 · answer #6 · answered by United_Peace 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Iraq is headed in the same direction of Afganistan, and for all of the same reasons. Afganistan was one of the most beautiful countries in the World until the West, including Russia went in and exploited it and destroyed it.
2007-01-28 08:09:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There will never be a winner.... but you can bet GWB will holler loud and clear that he was a great leader. I hope someone just shuts him the hell up.
2007-01-28 08:08:08 · answer #8 · answered by Debra H 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
always there are winners and losers
and as always the winners are the greedy politicians
and the losers are the young innocent adults killed from both sides
2007-01-28 08:13:46 · answer #9 · answered by going-to-light 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It certainly won't be any of the hundreds of thousands of people who have died in this catastrophe
2007-01-28 08:08:31 · answer #10 · answered by rosbif 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋