to be able to live for 100,000 years (at your current level of health from this point on), would you choose yes or no?
And there is no out clause or suicide option - if you choose yes you are alive for the whole 100k.
You may improve your health but you are promised you will not become in anyway unhealthier.
2007-01-28 06:45:49 · 36 answers · asked by lowroad 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Only under one condition: You and Basketcase live 100,000 years too and we 3 could RULE THE WORLD!!!
Look lowroad! God is cursing up there!!! Can you believe it?
2007-01-28 06:52:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No wish youngsters by technique of Wavves i like the Yoko. i might want to somewhat have the Yoko shrieking than the Yoko sex sounds yet i'm mature and all of us cause them to so as that isn't any longer the reason i'm vote casting for the different. I merely really like the Wavves. that's some thing i might want to probable have in heavy rotation if I had it. So, i wager i'd be getting it. You Dissolve by technique of The Thermals perhaps adverse to a diverse music On a street might want to've been extra captivating to me. i really loved You Dissolve and that i imagine that i'd have recognize those youngsters contained in the video at the same time as i become 12 or 13. "Come Monday evening" by technique of Stuart Murdoch i imagine this music is tremendous. It sounds type of Ye-ye. The Modest Mouse is a repetitive drone. I Knew by technique of Lightning dirt Sophie's decision. The centred visitor" by technique of Jim O'Rourke the different one seems meh.
2016-12-03 03:58:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
2007-01-28 06:49:16 · answer #3 · answered by zen522 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not just no, but HELL NO! In all likelihood I'd be the only human left in existance for thousands upon thousands of years with no way to entertain myself after the era of modern man ceases, save for masturbation and assorted boring menial tasks...I'd rather live out my years like a normal man and fade into obscurity.
2007-01-28 07:03:53 · answer #4 · answered by wetdreamdiver 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say no. The world sucks too much as it is — it'll only go further downhill in 100,000 years, and I don't want to be around to see it. I'd rather live fast and die sooner.
2007-01-28 08:37:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, the ppl i love is more important than my health and if i stay a live for the next 100,000 year with out them then i won't be living at all
2007-01-28 06:54:33 · answer #6 · answered by me 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would choose yes, however at the rate were going I cant say wether earth will be here that long :P
2007-01-28 06:52:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I wouldn't. Because you would see everyone around you dying off. Ever read the Anne Rice novels about the vampires?
2007-01-28 06:50:54 · answer #8 · answered by K-E-G 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yes, I have already been alive for 50,000 what's another 100K to a blood sucking vampire like me?
2007-01-28 20:22:32 · answer #9 · answered by Basket-santa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes
~LoveSick
2007-01-28 08:37:47 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋