Question for those who believe that Hillary Clinton has no foreign policy or military information background?

Question

My question to you is how do you support this stance? She was in the White House for eight years w/unlimited access to information, including everything to do with foreign policy, do you think someone this bright and focused didn't learn anything? Also, she has served on the Senate Committee for Armed Services for six years, with three subcommittee assignments to Airland, Emerging Threats & Capabilities, and Readiness & Management Support. Why do you say she has no experience in these matters? Thank you.

Airland: Has jurisdiction over Army & Air Force operations, bases and appropriations

Emerging Threats & Capabilities: Self-explanatory

Readiness:
This subcommittee's jurisdiction includes military readiness, logistics, environmental issues, business operations and working capital funds, real property maintenance, military construction, base realignment and closure, Armed Forces Retirement Home, readiness procurement and depots and shipyards

Answer 1

I agree completely, Hillary has been active in politics since the 60's,...she has made it her life. She also happens to be a genius at foreign relations, her and Bill made a lot of headway in that area, and a lot of their hardwork has been undone by you know who. Thanks for pointing that out to those who don't do their research before forming an opinion. :o)

Answer 2

Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the adventure, interior the militia or intelligence sectors of our authorities to be efficient in a time after we are battling a conflict oversees and engaging in a broader “conflict” on terrorism. frequently, this would not be an obstacle...there have been many good Presidents, without serious militia credentials –– her husband being one in all them. although, with the intention to rectify the quagmire that Bush has were given us in, and also to redirect the “conflict on Terrorism” more desirable effectively, and remote from this Cowboy/Rambo approach employed through Bush and his Henchmen, calls for someone of both militia or strategic competence. Hillary may be good at making chocolate chip cookies... yet immediately we go with someone who demonstrates mastery of both militia methods and overseas international kin.

Answer 3

Contrary to your belief, Billary's time in the White House is irrelevant. And she did NOT have "unlimited access to information;" she was the First Lady, not the President, and as the First Lady she is NOT authorized full and unrestricted access to anything and everything that comes across the President's bed. And if Slick Willy told her things he shouldn't have anyway, then he's in violation of several federal laws governing security of classified information and can be charged with a criminal offense. (That would never happen, of course, because Billary would never admit that happened, and Slick Willy would just put on his best "I did not have sexual relations with that woman!" face and lie his butt off....again.)

Along the same lines, the only things she learned about foreign policy was what she saw others do; she had no real hand in it, other than being a supportive piece of "eye candy" whenever Slick Willy made an appearance.

Her time served on the Senate Committee for Armed Services in no way makes her any kind of an expert on military affairs. Both she and her husband lack military experience, and that fact shows through crystal clear in both of them. If Slick Willy had an ounce of common sense and military training, he'd have taken his shot at Osama bin Laden when he had the chances - but he didn't have the training, so he let TWO chances to kill the world's leading terrorist BEFORE 9/11 get past him.

Billary Clinton got elected to the Senate from New York state because she told people what they wanted to hear. I lived in New Jersey at the time, and I saw first-hand what she did. She catered and gave lip service to the minorities; she told the blacks what they wanted to hear, so they voted for her; she told the Hispanics what they wanted to hear, so they voted for her; she told the Jews what they wanted to hear, so they voted for her. She DIDN'T tell the white people what they wanted to hear, but that didn't matter - she had enough of the minority vote in her pocket to sew up the election. To me, the fact that a woman from Arkansas (yeah, I know, she was born in Chicago) got elected senator from New York state by doing nothing more than crying out, "I LOVE NEW YORK!" and moving there after getting out of Washington only tells me that the people of New York aren't as smart as they like to think.

In terms of service, six years in the Senate is nothing more than a drop in the bucket. She has NO previous real "governing" experience under her belt, and that makes a HUGE difference in her qualifications. At least Slick Willy had that, since he was governor of Arkansas at one time; Billary doesn't have this, and nothing you can say will change that.

She has an agenda, and that agenda will NOT be good for America.

Answer 4

I don't question Hillarys intelligence or resoursefullness. I just don't like her philosophy. She is a Socialist at heart, and she is a dogmatic follower of political correctness. She is also a radical. She is also an unscrupulous opportunist who will change her stance to get what she wants. John McCain is a good, consistent man.

Answer 5

See how the same right wing fascists always answer in a sneering, uninformed way, instead of trying to answer in a dignified manner. It always seems to be the same group of wackos that take anything constructive and try to turn it into some fanatical rant, twisting and turning every little detail into a sleazfest. I hope all Democrats and others don't let the radical right get away with this kind of vitreol and venom like John Kerry failed to do when he was attacked . Fight back and don't let them get away with the lies and distortions in this election cycle.

Answer 6

I think Hillary would be the worst damn president we could have....and its not because shes a woman shes weak like her husband and just like him she is just gonna sit in that chair and not do SH!t.....what a damn waste....

Answer 7

She can have all the experience she wants....but to me, she's still Hillary Clinton. She's a phony (along with her husband). They lived for polls instead of sticking to convictions. She's no leader.

Answer 8

I don't care what kind of experience she has, she is a big, calculating phony and I don't trust the woman as far as I could throw her.

Answer 9

"She was in the White House for eight years..."

'Nuff said 'n eight years was enuff, already!!!

Answer 10

I don't believe that but who in their right minds would vote for her?seriously though.

Answer 11

? and what did she accomplish ?

and i see by your 360 profile that youre one of her campaign stooges.