I would say before
2007-01-28 06:36:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Adam and Eve is only a story, if you believe in Adam and Eve, then you also believe that the earth is only 6,000 years old, and there is not any way that it can be, unless you believe in magick. The dinosaurs were here millions of years before man was on earth. They have this well documented. In fact they have found the first fossil that is a direct descendant of man from the apes!
A quote from the site that I cited: "From the waist down the Dikika baby looked like us. One of her humanlike knees was complete with a kneecap no bigger than a dried pea. But her upper body, like Lucy's, had many apelike features. Her brain was small, her nose flat like a chimpanzee's, and her face long and projecting. Her finger bones were curved and almost as long as a chimp's. Her two complete shoulder blades, the first ever found from an australopith, were similar to those of a young gorilla—a shape that might have made it easy for her to climb. A. afarensis walked on two feet, but some scientists think this species also spent time in trees."
2007-01-28 14:54:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by hera 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Malone's excellent book, Search for the Truth.
Is this a scene from the blockbuster movie, Jurassic Park? It could be, but it isn't. This description, which perfectly fits an Apatosaurus, is a paraphrased description taken from one of the oldest books of the Bible, Job 40:15-24. If dinosaurs have been extinct for 65 million years, how could a writer of the Bible have accurately described the appearance, food, and habitat of this creature?
The vast majority of books on dinosaurs are written from an evolutionary perspective which assumes that the dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago. The leading model for the demise of the dinosaur involves a large asteroid hitting the earth. Yet the most obvious alternative explanation is almost always ignored. Almost all fossils are the remains of creatures buried by water-borne sediment which has subsequently turned to rock. If this is due to the flood of worldwide extent, as the water flowed over all the land surfaces, animals would have been drowned and been buried by massive amounts of rapidly accumulating sediment. It is not all surprising to find a general lack of burial mixing between these very different kinds of animals due to local or ecological grouping.
Genesis 7:2 states that Noah saved two of every representative "kind" of land animal on the ark. Noah would have taken young specimens, not huge, older creatures. Dinosaurs would have emerged from the ark to inhabit an entirely different world. Instead of a warm, mild climate worldwide, they would have found a harsh climate which soon settled into an ice age. If climatic hardships did not cause the dinosaur's extinction, man's tendency to destroy probably did.
In the early 1900's on the Doheny expedition into the Grand Canyon, Indian cave drawings were found which closely resembled a duck-billed dinosaur. Legends from ancient China to ancient England have recorded descriptions of dinosaur-like creatures. The Kuku Yalanji aboriginal people have paintings which look exactly like plesiosaurs. These and other intriguing evidences seem to indicate that perhaps that age of the dinosaurs ended more recently than is commonly taught. Christians do not need to feel foolish about standing on Scripture in their understanding of the world around us. There is ample evidence to support the Biblical record. Evolution serves as the foundation basis for the religions of humanism and atheism. These world views are popular because man, instead of God, decides on rules and moral standards. Creation serves as the foundational basis for Christianity which acknowledges that all things were created by God, that we live in a fallen universe, and that it will be restored to perfection in the future.
2007-01-28 16:06:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Freedom 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dinosaurs existed way before Adam and Eve did !
2007-01-28 14:39:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by IT'S JUST ME ! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The answers from the religious nutters-because that's what they are- are too incredible to be believed. Dinosaurs existed 200 million years ago so I don't know how that fits in with the Adam and Eve fable.
2007-01-28 14:49:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I have done some research and believe it or not, the names of the first two dinosaurs were in fact....Adam and Eve. Amazing, but true.
2007-01-28 15:00:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Andrew G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only logical answer would be before since Adam and Eve are not real.
2007-01-28 14:38:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by bc_munkee 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
if you go by the written order of the bible the dinosaurs would be first but it says it was the same day so there is no way to be sure unless we were there, it doesnt really matter.
we have fossils, there is the proof.
2007-01-28 14:43:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by disciple 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dinosaurs came before humans and most mammals, the proof lies in carbon dating of the fossils.
2007-01-28 14:37:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
They were created while Adam and Eve were alive,if thats what you mean,because Adam named all the animals.Genesis chapter 1...And yes...They were taken onto the ark,although probably as babies,since they take up less space and eat less that way.
2007-01-28 14:43:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
You believe in adam and eve and ask for proof?
This is parody, surely.
2007-01-28 14:41:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋