Please use detail (if you have an explanation) and logically consider.
2007-01-28 05:28:04 · 14 answers · asked by Spent On Rainy Days 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Godless- A plausible explanation for anything to exist without a purple hedgehog tree is different than a plausible explanation for anything to exist without a God, or Creator. A purple hedgehog tree is an object, not a God. You could logically make a hypothesis saying... "It is plausible for something to exist without a purple hedgehog tree, for whatever caused purple, hedgehogs, and trees to exist should reasonably be able to cause something else to exist." But to speak of God would be different, as the attribute God has is the authority over all creation, and is forever, infinite, and without an image. The definition of God is: the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe. A being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principle object of faith and worship in monotheistic beliefs.
2007-01-28 13:20:11 · update #1
-EXTENDED EXPIRATION-
I am giving anyone time for a chance to share a plausible explanation that enables anything to exist without a Creator, for there are no arguments for this yet (that use reason).
2007-01-30 18:45:45 · update #2
I know that everything was created by God. There is no way for life to have begun without him.
Imagine if your children one day asked you to "prove" that they would not exist without you.
2007-01-28 05:59:37 · answer #1 · answered by Jennifer D 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you know a plausible explanation for anything to exist without a purple hedgehog tree? Because I have it on good authority that we are all here only by the grace of the purple hedgehog.
2007-01-28 05:31:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
There is no plausible explanation as science does not even know how life arose in the first place. If someone can disprove this I would love to know what their proof is. In fact the whole science community would be thrilled. D'ont get dissiluioned by angry rhetoric, this is simply indicitive of hitting a nerve. No one likes to have their beliefs scrutinized because this causes them to have to second guess themselves after they thought they had dealt with the issue and safely tucked it away. I heard a good saying once when the chicken squaks the loudest it's gonna lay a big egg.
2007-01-28 05:35:18 · answer #3 · answered by Edward J 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No way. The topic of creation and God is extremely important. It is the knowledge of origins of all things on earth and beyond. And it is important to know after death where to is the human soul. If no soul is the belief, how life is returned to the origin.
2007-01-28 05:35:40 · answer #4 · answered by Ptuan 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Come on... We're done discussing the topic of creation and how the world came to be. Read the other topics, they're all a bit boring, but still new topics.
2007-01-28 05:31:20 · answer #5 · answered by The World Ends with You 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having a Creator does not mean they are still around, or that they are good, or care about us, or any of that. It does not prove a specific God.
2007-01-28 05:32:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we are looking for a plausible explanation, shouldn't we also determine if god is or is not a plausible explanation
2007-01-28 05:32:09 · answer #7 · answered by Nick F 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no logic in believing in Gods. Almost every society on Earth has had Gods and then grown wise enough to understand their stupidity and eschew them.
Cling on to your primitive beliefs by all means but please do not criticise others for living in the real world. That is just religious intolerance on your behalf.
2007-01-28 05:45:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it form of feels to me that the tremendous Bang became the first result without obvious reason, making it the remarkable supernatural experience it is ever handed off. How is it defined scientifically?.
2016-10-16 05:31:23 · answer #9 · answered by rotchford 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Get an education.
2007-01-28 05:32:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋